My focus for this month of October will be on NestJS framework and how it has imparted my development experience as a fullstack software engineer. NestJS provides a structured framework for building Node.js applications, but the framework alone does not determine whether an application will be maintainable in production.
The architecture surrounding the framework matters a lot. I will be sharing overview on my opinions when developing a secure and scalable systems in NestJS.
Feature-oriented modules
I prefer organizing backend systems around business capabilities rather than technical file types.
For example:
src/
├── modules/
│ ├── users/
│ ├── authentication/
│ ├── payments/
│ └── notifications/
│
├── infrastructure/
├── shared/
└── main.ts
This keeps related business functionality together.
Dependency boundaries
Business logic should not directly depend on infrastructure details.
For example, application code should depend on an abstraction:
export interface EmailSender {
send(message: EmailMessage): Promise<void>;
}
rather than directly depending on a specific provider.
The infrastructure layer can then implement it:
export class ResendEmailSender implements EmailSender {
async send(message: EmailMessage): Promise<void> {
// provider implementation
}
}
This makes it possible to replace infrastructure without rewriting business logic.
The goal
The goal is not to create the largest possible architecture.
The goal is to create a system where important decisions remain easy to change.
That principle becomes increasingly important as an application grows.
Top comments (0)