DEV Community

Vaibhav Kulshrestha
Vaibhav Kulshrestha

Posted on

Testing for Accessibility: Building Inclusive Software in 2025

Image description
In today’s digital-first world, software should work for everyone — not just the majority.

Accessibility testing ensures your applications are usable by people of all abilities, including those with visual, auditory, cognitive, or motor impairments.

And in 2025, accessibility isn't just a nice-to-have — it's a legal, ethical, and business-critical requirement.

🧩 What Is Accessibility Testing?

Accessibility testing (a11y) is the process of evaluating whether a digital product (website, app, or software system) can be effectively used by individuals with disabilities.

This includes checking compatibility with:

  • Screen readers
  • Keyboard navigation
  • Voice control
  • Text-to-speech (TTS) tools
  • High-contrast modes
  • Closed captions
  • Colorblind-safe designs

It also involves ensuring the product follows standards like:

  • WCAG 2.2 (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines)
  • ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act)
  • Section 508 (U.S. federal compliance)
  • EN 301 549 (Europe)

🔍 Why It Matters in 2025

✅ Expanding Global Regulation
More countries now require accessibility compliance — not just for public services but all digital platforms.

✅ Ethical and Inclusive Development
Building accessible software is part of digital equality — ensuring everyone has the right to access information and services.

✅ Business ROI
Accessible apps serve wider markets, reduce legal risks, improve SEO, and foster brand trust.

✅ User-Centered Design
Testing for accessibility forces teams to think about all user journeys, not just average ones — improving overall UX.

🛠️ Common Areas Tested for Accessibility

1️⃣ Keyboard Navigation

  • Can users navigate without a mouse?
  • Are focus indicators visible?

2️⃣ Screen Reader Compatibility

  • Do all UI elements have descriptive aria-labels or alt tags?
  • Is reading order logical?

3️⃣ Color Contrast and Text Readability

  • Are foreground/background contrasts strong enough?
  • Is text scalable?

4️⃣ Form Validation and Feedback

  • Are errors announced clearly to assistive tech users?

5️⃣ Media Accessibility

  • Do videos have captions?
  • Is audio content transcribed?

6️⃣ Dynamic Content

  • Are updates announced via ARIA live regions for users who can’t see visual changes?

🧪 Tools Used in 2025

Accessibility testing has evolved from manual-only to automated + manual hybrid testing.

🔧 Automation Tools:

  • Axe DevTools
  • Lighthouse (Google)
  • WAVE (Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool)
  • Pa11y
  • Tota11y
  • Tenon.io
  • Playwright + Axe-core for test automation

🙋‍♂️ Manual & Assistive Testing:

  • JAWS and NVDA (screen readers)
  • VoiceOver (Mac/iOS)
  • Dragon NaturallySpeaking (voice control)
  • ZoomText (magnification)
  • Keyboard-only navigation testing

🧠 AI-enhanced tools (2025):
Some platforms now use AI to suggest WCAG improvements, auto-fix minor violations, or simulate accessibility issues in visual design tools.

📈 Accessibility Testing in CI/CD

Modern accessibility testing is shifting left and scaling right:

✅ Integrate Axe/Lighthouse checks into your CI pipelines
✅ Use GitHub Actions or GitLab CI to run tests on PRs
✅ Include accessibility acceptance criteria in sprint planning
✅ Track accessibility metrics across releases

⚠️ Common Pitfalls to Avoid

❌ Relying only on automation — most tools catch ~30–40% of issues
❌ Ignoring keyboard users
❌ Forgetting alt text on dynamic content
❌ Not involving real users with disabilities in testing
❌ Assuming one standard applies to all countries

🔄 Best Practices for 2025

  • Include accessibility from design phase
  • Train devs & testers on WCAG standards
  • Create reusable accessible components
  • Use semantic HTML over div-heavy UIs
  • Add accessibility stories to your agile backlog
  • Run inclusive usability tests

🎯 Final Thoughts

Accessible design is good design.
And accessible testing is smart QA.

In 2025, the most forward-thinking engineering teams aren’t asking “Should we test for accessibility?” — they’re asking:

“How can we make this experience work for everyone?”

💬 Are you incorporating accessibility testing into your QA process?

👇 Share your tools, insights, and accessibility wins.

Top comments (0)