DEV Community

loading...

Discussion on: An Organizer's Guide to Pronoun Buttons

veraticus profile image
Josh Symonds

Compelled speech is the issue, not the pronouns.

There is no difference. No one is asking you to subjugate your thoughts or speech, they're asking you to use the right pronouns for them, when you might not know said correct pronouns. If that requires "mental slavery" on your part, the problem is you, not the ask.

This is why I said earlier that your mental state about this is irrelevant; all that matters is getting the pronouns right. If that requires some crazy redefinition of the categories of male and female, or the very concept of pronouns themselves, that's on you. I would hope that a few people not visually conforming to the gender you expect wouldn't require crazy mental gymnastics.

You even agree that it is possible and you're fine with it. I'm telling you the ideal you're fighting for is not related to this fight. I hope you recognize that now.

And, just to reiterate: obviously you're not required to get the pronouns right. But then you'll be removed from the communities where getting them right is important. This is not an abridgment of your rights, it is an exercise of the rights of the community.

Well, if this @thepracticaldev community adopts such policies of compelled speech, then me and people that upvoted me might be excluded.

What policies are you referring to here? As far as I'm aware, no one in these comments or the original article has suggested anything even remotely like new policies or policy changes.

But, even if they had, I feel I must point out to you that @thepracticaldev community is not a totalitarian government. They cannot force you to change the way you think on threat of pain or death. If they adopt policies you don't like, you may leave (or be forced to leave), and suffer only a little unhappiness. Don't cheapen Orwell's very real warnings about excessive government authority by applying them to a minority group and a voluntary online community.

Thread Thread
vladimir_vg profile image
Vladimir Gordeev ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ • Edited

I'm telling you the ideal you're fighting for is not related to this fight. I hope you recognize that now.

What policies are you referring to here?

Actually I was referring to following quote in the article:

My pronouns arenโ€™t a preference, theyโ€™re my pronouns. Theyโ€™re mandatory. Donโ€™t refer to pronouns as โ€œpreferredโ€ at any point during your event, otherwise people are likely to get the idea that itโ€™s optional to respect the pronouns of other people

These things can't be mandatory, only voluntarily.

Don't cheapen Orwell's very real warnings about excessive government authority by applying them to a minority group and a voluntary online community.

This policy of compelled speech is already adopted in Canada. For now it seem to cover only pronouns, but that's how it starts.

Orwellian nightmare is not that unrelated as you may think.

Thread Thread
vladimir_vg profile image
Vladimir Gordeev ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ

I think we had thoughtful and constructive discussion. Thank you, @veraticus .

Thread Thread
veraticus profile image
Josh Symonds

These things can't be mandatory, only voluntarily.

The correct reading of that sentence is: "don't use the word 'preferred' when discussing my pronouns, because they're mandatory to address me properly." I think you might have misread it -- or, at least, I'm entirely uncertain how you've spun the idea that proper pronoun use == slavery from what @sublimemarch said there.

This policy of compelled speech is already adopted in Canada. For now it seem to cover only pronouns, but that's how it starts.

I'd be happy to have a discussion about Canada's legislation of intentional pronoun misuse as discrimination! Of course, that discussion is mega off-topic for this comment thread and is also entirely unrelated to the article here, because again, this is discussing not government laws or even this community's policies, but how to make attendees at engineering events feel comfortable. So let's keep our reactions confined to that and try to avoid hyperbole and slippery slope.

Thread Thread
thejessleigh profile image
jess unrein • Edited

Vladimir stopped engaging with me after I invoked the Paradox of Tolerance and let him know that CoCs protect him too, so I'll be (relatively) brief because I don't want to engage people who don't engage me.

Please be mindful of bandying about terms like "slavery." There is actual slavery in the world, and historical slavery is one of the most egregious parts of human history. Equating a request to be respectful about pronouns to slavery is incredibly disrespectful to...well....pretty much everyone.

Also, I'd like to reiterate a point Josh made early on - you keep asserting your right to refuse to use pronouns and keep talking about free speech. No one is fighting you for this hill you're trying to die on. We all agree you have the right to refuse. And event organizers have the right to decide against giving space to people who refuse basic courtesy.

Imma pop out of this discussion now. I've said my piece, and given that you keep hammering home a point that no one is fighting you on, I've ceased to believe you're engaging in this discussion in good faith. I hope I'm wrong. Have a nice day.

Thread Thread
vladimir_vg profile image
Vladimir Gordeev ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ

I've ceased to believe you're engaging in this discussion in good faith. I hope I'm wrong.

I was sincere and tried to tell the truth as I see it.

Have a nice day.