DEV Community

vijay chougule
vijay chougule

Posted on

Inside a Mobile App Testing Workflow Before App Store Submission

Shipping a mobile app sounds exciting until the final testing phase begins.

Because this is usually where teams discover:

  • Unexpected crashes
  • Onboarding issues
  • Device compatibility problems
  • Performance drops
  • App Store rejection risks

Internally, many apps appear stable before submission.

The core features work.
The team already tested major flows.
Everything feels launch-ready.

Then real-world testing starts.

And suddenly, small issues begin appearing everywhere.

Recently, during a mobile app QA cycle, we tested an app that worked perfectly on internal devices.

However, once broader testing began across real Android and iOS devices, the experience changed quickly.

Within the first few hours, we found:

  • Broken onboarding on smaller devices
  • Loading freezes during interruptions
  • Notification permission inconsistencies
  • Performance drops on mid-range Android phones

None of these issues appeared during internal testing.

This is why structured mobile app testing workflows matter before App Store submission.

Especially for startups and growing products.

Mobile app testing services

Why Final Testing Before Submission Matters

App Store launches create first impressions very quickly.

Users expect:

  • Smooth onboarding
  • Responsive UI
  • Stable performance
  • Fast loading
  • Compatibility across devices

Unfortunately, users rarely report small frustrations anymore.

Instead:

  • They uninstall
  • Leave poor reviews
  • Abandon onboarding
  • Stop opening the app

That makes pre-submission QA incredibly important.

Especially during early growth stages.

Step 1: Build Verification Testing

The workflow usually starts with verifying whether the latest build is stable enough for deeper QA.

At this stage, testers validate:

  • App installation
  • Startup behavior
  • Login functionality
  • Navigation basics
  • Crash-free launches

This phase helps identify obvious blockers early before investing time in detailed testing cycles.

Because sometimes even small deployment changes introduce:

  • Startup crashes
  • Broken APIs
  • Missing assets
  • Authentication failures

before testing properly begins.

Step 2: Functional Testing Across Core Flows

Once the build looks stable, testers begin validating the main user journeys.

For example:

  • Signup
  • Onboarding
  • Payments
  • Search
  • Profile management
  • Notifications
  • Logout flows This stage focuses heavily on whether the app behaves correctly from the user perspective.

Importantly, workflows are tested as complete journeys rather than isolated features.

Because individual features may work independently while full user flows still fail.

For example:

  • Signup works.
  • Verification works.
  • Profile setup works. However:

Signup → verification → interruption → return flow

may expose hidden issues.

Step 3: Real Device Compatibility Testing

This is often where startups discover the biggest surprises.

Internally, apps are commonly tested on:

  • Newer iPhones
  • Flagship Android devices
  • Simulators

However, real users use:

  • Older Android phones
  • Mid-range devices
  • Tablets
  • Slower internet connections
  • Multiple OS versions

During compatibility testing, teams often uncover:

  • Layout overlap
  • Touch responsiveness issues
  • Broken UI scaling
  • Keyboard overlap bugs
  • Camera permission problems

The app technically “works.”

However, the experience differs significantly across devices.

That difference directly impacts retention.

Step 4: Interruption and Real-World Usage Testing

One major mistake many teams make is testing only uninterrupted flows.

Real users behave unpredictably.

They:

  • Switch apps
  • Receive phone calls
  • Lock screens
  • Rotate devices
  • Lose internet connections

During interruption testing, apps frequently expose:

  • Frozen screens
  • Broken sessions
  • Incomplete loading states
  • Duplicate actions
  • Navigation loops

These bugs often remain invisible during controlled internal QA.

However, real users encounter them constantly.

Step 5: Performance and Stability Testing

At this stage, the focus shifts toward:

  • Responsiveness
  • Loading performance
  • Memory usage
  • Long-session stability

Especially on Android devices, testers may identify:

  • FPS drops
  • Overheating
  • Battery drain
  • Animation lag
  • Delayed interactions

Internally, teams often underestimate how noticeable performance friction becomes for users.

Even small delays during:

  • Onboarding
  • Payments
  • Screen transitions

can increase uninstall rates quickly.

Step 6: Regression Testing Before Submission

Once fixes are completed, regression testing ensures:

  • Old functionality still works
  • New fixes did not break other systems
  • App stability remains consistent

This phase becomes extremely important because rushed fixes near release often create additional bugs.

Especially before App Store submission deadlines.

Step 7: Final App Store Readiness Checks

Before submission, teams usually verify:

  • Permission flows
  • Privacy messaging
  • Deep links
  • App metadata
  • Push notifications
  • Offline handling
  • Error messaging

This final review helps reduce:

  • App Store rejection risks
  • Onboarding confusion
  • Broken production experiences

before users access the live version.

What We Commonly See Before Submission

Some recurring issues appear surprisingly often during mobile app testing services:

  • Broken onboarding on smaller devices
  • Inconsistent push notification behavior
  • Login persistence failures
  • Touch responsiveness problems
  • UI scaling issues
  • Performance drops on older Android devices

Most teams do not notice these internally because testing environments remain limited.

Real-device testing changes that quickly.

Why More Teams Use External Mobile App Testing Services

Many startups and app teams now involve external QA before submission because external testers provide:

  • Broader device coverage
  • Unbiased usability feedback
  • Real-world testing scenarios
  • Fresh user perspectives that internal teams naturally miss.

Especially for growing apps, this often becomes more efficient than maintaining large in-house device inventories.

Final Thoughts

A mobile app can appear completely stable internally while still creating frustrating experiences for real users.

And users rarely explain those frustrations anymore.

They simply:

  • Uninstall
  • Abandon onboarding
  • Leave poor reviews

That’s why modern mobile app testing workflows focus heavily on:

  • Real-device coverage
  • Interruption testing
  • Usability validation
  • Performance testing
  • Complete user journeys

before App Store submission.

Because launch quality now affects far more than bugs.

It affects retention, ratings, trust, and long-term growth.

About Testers HUB

At Testers HUB, we help startups and businesses validate mobile apps before release through:

mobile app testing services
Android and iOS testing
real-device compatibility testing
usability testing
startup-focused QA workflows

before hidden issues affect real users.

Top comments (0)