Peekaping — a modern alternative for Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma is one of the most popular tools for monitoring websites and servers with open source code.

It is simple, convenient, and perfectly suitable for home or small infrastructures.

However, it has limitations in scalability and flexibility.

If you are looking for a new alternative for Uptime Kuma, you should pay attention to Peekaping — a modern, high-performance, and extensible monitoring platform written in Go.

What is Peekaping — an alternative for Uptime Kuma with Go architecture and API-first approach

Peekaping is an open monitoring system focused on performance and extensibility.

It allows tracking the availability of websites, APIs, databases, message brokers, containers, and other services, providing flexible tools for notifications and status pages.

• GitHub: Peekaping on GitHub
• Documentation: Peekaping Docs

Peekaping is currently in beta version, but already offers rich functionality that surpasses Uptime Kuma in several areas.

Capabilities of Peekaping as an alternative for Uptime Kuma

Peekaping provides the full set of features expected from a modern monitoring solution:

• Types of checks: HTTP/HTTPS, TCP, Ping, DNS, Docker containers, PostgreSQL, MySQL/MariaDB, MongoDB, Redis, Kafka, RabbitMQ, MQTT, SNMP, gRPC, and many more.
• Notifications: Telegram, Slack, Discord, Signal, Email, Webhook, PagerDuty, Opsgenie, Grafana OnCall, Twilio, WhatsApp, Gotify, Pushover, and others.
• Database support: SQLite, PostgreSQL, MongoDB.
• Public status pages and SVG badges for visual display of service states.
• Modern stack: Go on backend, React + TypeScript on frontend, live updates via WebSocket.
• API-first architecture: the entire functionality is available through REST API, which opens the way to automation and integration.

Advantages of Peekaping as an alternative for Uptime Kuma

💡 Criterion	Peekaping	Uptime Kuma
Performance	Go — compiled language, minimal resources	Node.js — higher CPU and memory load
Architecture	API-first, modular	Monolithic
Data storage	SQLite, PostgreSQL, MongoDB	Only SQLite
Integrations and notifications	More than 20 channels, including enterprise ones	Fewer options
Monitoring types	Support for databases, brokers, containers	Mainly HTTP/TCP/DNS
UI/UX	React + TypeScript, modern interface	Vue.js
Scalability	Suitable for large installations	Optimal for small usage

Why Peekaping is a promising alternative for Uptime Kuma

Peekaping is oriented toward corporate scenarios and large infrastructures.

Its Go-based architecture ensures stability, high performance, and low resource consumption, and the ability to use different databases makes the solution flexible for integration into existing environments.

If Uptime Kuma fits well for a home server or a small project, then Peekaping can be seen as the next step — a more technological and scalable platform.

When it is worth choosing Peekaping as an alternative for Uptime Kuma

Choosing Peekaping will be justified if you need to:

• Monitor many different systems (APIs, databases, message brokers, containers, etc.)
• Deploy monitoring in a corporate environment
• Integrate checks through REST API
• Store data in PostgreSQL or MongoDB
• Use a lightweight and fast Go server

When Uptime Kuma remains the best choice

Uptime Kuma still perfectly suits you if you are looking for:

• A simple “out of the box” solution without complex settings
• A reliable and time-tested tool
• Support of a large community and ready-made guides
• Minimal system requirements and easy installation

Result: Peekaping — a worthy alternative for Uptime Kuma

Peekaping is a young but promising tool that offers a more modern stack, powerful API, and flexibility in configuration.

It is created for those who want not just “to monitor uptime,” but to build a reliable and scalable observation system for the whole infrastructure.

If you are searching for a modern alternative for Uptime Kuma, try Peekaping — perhaps this is exactly the step forward you were looking for.