The majority of articles you'll find online about Google Business Profile will instruct you to complete all the fields and post regularly. None have any idea of what's actually going on when Google searches a listing, or why two businesses on the same street, with the exact same product, can rank differently in search results.
The solution is: structured data.
Google isn't reading your listing. It Is Parsing It.
Google is not reading and interpreting text when crawling a Google Business Profile as a human would do. It's scraping out data from the web that are structured with schema.org — a common vocabulary that search engines can use to comprehend the entities on the web.
Every field corresponds to a schema.org type. The business name maps to schema:LocalBusiness > name. The address maps to schema:PostalAddress. Opening hours map to schema:openingHoursSpecification. The business category maps to schema:LocalBusiness subtypes — schema:Restaurant, schema:AutoRepair, schema:MedicalClinic.
Once these fields are filled, Google is able to create a complete entity graph of the company. Incomplete graphs have gaps, and an entity with an incomplete graph is one Google can't be sure of or rank.
All data integrity issues are consistency issues.Every data integrity problem is a consistency problem.
Google cross-references the Business Profile against every other structured source where the business appears — directories, review platforms, website markup, social profiles. The Name, Address, and Phone (NAP) across all these sources needs to be character-for-character identical. "Road" versus "Rd," a missing floor number, a differently formatted phone number — these are conflicting data points. When Google encounters them, it reduces its confidence score for the entity. Lower confidence means lower local ranking.
This is a data consistency issue, it's not a content issue. Even if a company has a great rating, really good photos and still ranks lower than another business due to their NAP data differences across 3 directories.
Reviews are a Temporal Activity Metric.
Often reviews are used as a quality indicator. They are actually a more time dependent activity measure. Google takes active (new) review flow seriously when reviewing velocity. Two reviews per month is consistently better than one review per month with a higher rating, but no new reviews for 6 months.
The review velocity is an approximation of business activity. If a business is reviewed regularly, it can be proven that the business is active. Google won't know which of the two signals will be the correct one, so it falls back on the one which shows more recent signals, if the business is not recently reviewed. That's why 40 reviews, with 4.2 stars, are better than 5 reviews with 5 stars. Volume and recency are more important than rating in Google's local ranking algorithm.
How this is applied in practice.
The top businesses in local search don't get their ranking due to their copy or their more interesting photos. They are in place because they have been treating their Google Business Profile as a structured data source, i.e., complete, consistent and regularly updated.
Incomplete profile is a missing node entity graph. Data Integrity failure is an inconsistent NAP. If no new content has been added to a listing in recent years, then Google's crawler will assume that it is probably no longer being actively updated and thus will not crawl it as often.
More than 2.5 lakh merchants who created consistent and complete profiles on Vyaparify observed tangible results in the local search visibility within 60-90 days without changing their businesses, but only by fixing their data.
Top comments (0)