This piece examines why Davos remains influential for crypto companies — not as a stage for visibility, but as a space where trust and long-term relationships are quietly formed.
Every January, crypto founders ask the same question: Is Davos worth it — or is it unreachable and non-crypto-friendly?
After working with World Economic Forum and unDavos Summit along with quite a few crypto companies like DFINITY Foundation or Datafund navigating WEF week, the answer is not as clear as you'd think.
It's not About Visibility — It’s About Proximity
Keyword "Davos" fills your standard imagination with familiar images: snow-dusted chalets, black SUVs idling outside hotels, panels stacked with world leaders and corporate titans. For many companies — especially in crypto — the instinct is to chase visibility within this spectacle.
That instinct is usually wrong.
Davos does not reward those who are loud. It rewards those who are close.
The most consequential conversations rarely happen on stages. They happen in side rooms, private residences, and invitation-only dinners where attendance is neither accidental nor democratic. Access is curated. Presence is intentional. And proximity — physical, relational, reputational — is the true currency of the week.
To misunderstand this is to misunderstand Davos itself.
Why Crypto Teams Rarely Get It Right at Davos
Crypto brands often arrive in Davos carrying hopes shaped by traditional conferences: branding, PR, extensive networking. They come looking for loads of attention.
But Davos is not built for hype-hunger. It is built for trust bonding.
The mismatch is core. Crypto, as an industry, has learned to dash, blah-blah a lot, and scale narratives. Davos moves differently. It values discretion over reach, credibility over momentum, and continuity over novelty.
Many crypto teams mix presence and impact. They host regular side events, chase press mentions, or attempt to “announce” themselves into relevance — only to leave without having built the relationships that actually endure beyond the week.
What Actually Moves the Needle
What works in Davos is very simple — and deeply human.
- Private dinners remain the most effective format. Not because of exclusivity for its own sake, but because trust accelerates when conversation slows down.
- Investor–founder conversations matter more than panels. Davos compresses time: relationships that might take months elsewhere can form in days — if the environment allows for candor rather than performance.
- Policy-adjacent networking is where crypto quietly finds leverage. Regulators, institutional stakeholders, and infrastructure players are not looking to be convinced; they are looking to understand. The companies that succeed are those willing to listen first.
None of this is visible on social media. And that is precisely the point.
Should You Stay or Should You Go?
Davos is not for everyone. It is one of the best filters out there.
It is for teams that:
- are already operating at a certain level of maturity (or ready to proceed to that level fast)
- understand that influence is cumulative, not immediate
- get the value of UHNI face-to-face relationship building
- are prepared to invest in building the rapport without demanding instant returns
It is NOT for those seeking quickies, viral moments, or guaranteed outcomes. Wrong place. What it offers instead is something slower, subtler, and ultimately more durable: the chance to be taken seriously by people who rarely extend that courtesy.
For crypto companies ready for that responsibility, Davos can be transformative. For others, it is better observed from a distance.
Davos is not where stories are broadcast. It is where they quietly begin.
This article is adapted from a longer analysis originally published on Belkin Marketing.
Top comments (0)