A Practical Comparison of BlockATM, Fireblocks, and Ledger Vault for Crypto Payments

1. Cost Comparison: BlockATM Offers Substantial Long-Term Savings
   Fireblocks and Ledger Vault both charge annual fees that can reach tens of thousands of dollars. In contrast, BlockATM has a simple pricing model: a one-time smart contract deployment fee of just 200 USD, with ongoing fees of 2 USD per incoming transaction and 1 USD per outgoing transaction. For businesses handling frequent payments, this fixed, per-transaction model translates to significant long-term savings.

2. Integration Time: 10 Minutes with BlockATM vs. Weeks with Others
   Fireblocks and Ledger Vault require extensive compliance checks and onboarding procedures, often taking 4–8 weeks. BlockATM, on the other hand, requires no KYC and can be fully integrated in under 10 minutes. For fast-growing businesses, this speed-to-market is a game-changer.

3. Flexibility and Full Control of Funds
   BlockATM supports both wallet and QR code-based payments, whereas most competitors only offer QR code options. More importantly, funds are entirely controlled by the business through smart contracts. Unlike Fireblocks, which may freeze assets due to internal risk controls, BlockATM ensures instant, permissionless access to your funds—no approvals, no delays.

Final Verdict
After testing all three platforms, BlockATM clearly provided the best overall experience—in cost-efficiency, setup time, and operational flexibility. The right payment gateway can save cross-border businesses a significant amount of money and time. It’s no surprise BlockATM is becoming a go-to choice for Web3-savvy merchants.