Short answer: yes for quality on most content, no for speed and free-quota. We tested both on 5 content types — here's the per-task verdict.
The setup
Same source text, both engines. 5 content types: literary prose, technical paper, casual chat, formal email, software code comment.
Per-task verdict
- Literary prose — ChatGPT wins clearly. Google often produces literal but flat translations.
- Technical paper — ChatGPT wins. GPT-4 knows recent CS/ML jargon; Google's vocab can lag.
- Casual chat (emoji, slang) — ChatGPT wins. Google misreads informal register.
- Formal email — Tie. Both produce clean professional output for major language pairs.
- Code comments — ChatGPT wins (especially with surrounding code as context).
Where Google still wins
- Speed — Google Translate is instant; GPT-4 takes 1-3 seconds
- Free quota — Google is completely free; ChatGPT free tier is rate-limited
- Mobile-app integration — Google Translate is on every phone
- Offline mode — Google supports offline language packs
On Mac specifically
If you do AI translation regularly on Mac, install Lazie — it routes your selections through ChatGPT (or Claude) with the surrounding context attached. Better than copy-pasting into chatgpt.com because Lazie sends document context to GPT, not just the isolated sentence.
Originally published at lazie.ai — the AI translator for Mac.
Top comments (0)