A technology roadmap can be built in a spreadsheet, a presentation tool, or a dedicated roadmapping platform. The right tool depends on the roadmap's audience, the team's existing workflow, and how frequently the roadmap will be updated. These eight tools cover the range from zero cost and maximum flexibility to purpose-built roadmapping features with structured workflows.
For context on what makes a roadmap effective before choosing a tool, the technology roadmap guide on the 137Foundry blog covers the structure and process. The tool is secondary to having the right content.
1. Notion
Notion offers free-tier access for individuals and small teams, with database views, timeline views, and linked documents that work well for roadmapping. A Notion roadmap typically combines a database of initiatives (with status, owner, quarter, and business objective fields) with a timeline view and a linked document for each initiative's business case.
The strength of Notion for roadmapping is flexibility. You can adapt the schema to fit exactly the fields your organization needs without being constrained by a product roadmap tool that assumes a specific process. The weakness is that building a good Notion roadmap requires more setup work than a dedicated tool.
Notion's free plan supports unlimited pages and blocks for one workspace, which is sufficient for most single-team roadmaps.
2. Miro
Miro is a collaborative whiteboard that has roadmap templates out of the box. The free tier allows three editable boards, which is enough to prototype a roadmap or maintain a small one. Paid plans start at $10 per user per month.
Miro works well for roadmaps that need to be presented visually in leadership meetings. You can build the timeline view in Miro, share a read-only link for stakeholders who need to review it, and update it directly during planning sessions with multiple people editing simultaneously.
The weakness is that Miro is a visual tool, not a data tool. It does not handle the business case documents or the initiative tracking that the roadmap connects to. Miro is best used as the presentation layer, with the underlying data living in Notion or a spreadsheet.
3. Trello
Trello is a Kanban board tool with a generous free tier. For roadmaps, Trello works best as an initiative tracker organized by quarter or by status. Each card represents an initiative; the card description holds the business case; labels represent the business objective the initiative supports.
Trello's Timeline view (available on paid plans) adds a Gantt-style view that makes the roadmap visually readable for stakeholders. On the free plan, the Kanban board alone is functional for managing a small roadmap.
The limitation is that Trello does not have good support for hierarchical initiatives -- projects that contain multiple sub-projects across quarters. For roadmaps with complex dependencies, a more structured tool works better.
4. GitHub Projects
GitHub Projects (included with all GitHub plans, including free) works surprisingly well for technology roadmaps managed by engineering-adjacent teams. Projects supports table, board, and timeline views, with custom fields for priority, quarter, status, and business objective.
The integration with GitHub issues means that the roadmap initiative links directly to the engineering work items delivering it. A stakeholder looking at the roadmap can click through to the issues and see progress in real time. This is particularly useful for roadmaps where the audience includes technical stakeholders who want implementation detail.
The weakness is that GitHub is not a business tool. Non-technical stakeholders may be comfortable viewing a GitHub Project in read-only mode, but they will not contribute to it directly.
5. Jira
Jira from Atlassian has a free tier for up to 10 users. The Roadmap view (called Plans on paid plans) provides a timeline view of epics that can be used as a lightweight technology roadmap.
For teams already using Jira for sprint management, building the technology roadmap inside Jira creates a direct link between the strategic roadmap and the delivery backlog. A roadmap initiative becomes a Jira epic; stories and tasks under the epic represent the work.
Jira's free tier has limited roadmap functionality -- the full Plans feature requires a paid plan. For basic roadmapping, the free tier is functional but constrained.
6. Airtable
Airtable combines spreadsheet flexibility with relational database structure. The free tier supports unlimited bases with basic features. A roadmap in Airtable typically has an initiatives table (with business objective, quarter, status, cost estimate, and owner fields), linked to a goals table (the business objectives from the strategic plan), and linked to a timeline view.
Airtable's strength is the ability to create multiple views of the same data for different audiences. The executive view shows initiatives grouped by business objective. The delivery team view shows initiatives sorted by quarter. Finance sees the cost and resource fields. All views pull from the same underlying data.
The Airtable free tier limits automation features and some view types, but the core relational database and multiple views work well for roadmapping.
7. Monday.com
Monday.com has a free plan for up to 2 users, which limits its usefulness for team roadmapping, but the individual plan starts at $9 per user per month. It includes Gantt views, timeline views, and integration with popular project management workflows.
Monday.com's strength is the richness of its views and the ease of creating a visually polished roadmap that looks good in presentations. The workflow automation features help with status updates -- an initiative that moves from "planned" to "in progress" can automatically notify stakeholders.
The limitation compared to Notion or Airtable is less flexibility in data structure. Monday.com is more opinionated about how a roadmap should be organized, which is sometimes a feature (less setup time) and sometimes a constraint (harder to adapt to unusual workflows).
8. Aha!
Aha! is a purpose-built product and technology roadmapping platform. It is not free -- pricing starts at $59 per user per month -- but it is included here because it represents the high end of dedicated roadmap tooling. For organizations that are investing seriously in roadmap management and need features like goal-to-initiative linking, capacity planning, and executive reporting dashboards, Aha! is the benchmark.
Aha! has direct integrations with Jira, GitHub, Azure DevOps, and other engineering tools, so the roadmap initiative connects directly to the delivery backlog. It also has a built-in strategy layer where you can document business goals and link them explicitly to roadmap items, which is the connection that is often missing in lighter tools.
The price point means Aha! is most appropriate for product and technology teams at mid-market or enterprise companies that have outgrown Jira's roadmap views and need more structure for stakeholder communication.
Choosing the Right Tool
For most teams getting started, Notion or Airtable on the free tier provides enough structure without requiring significant setup investment. For teams with a visual-first stakeholder culture, adding Miro for the presentation layer works well alongside either. For teams deeply embedded in GitHub workflows, GitHub Projects is the lowest-friction option.
The tool matters less than the process. A roadmap built on the right foundation -- business objectives driving initiative selection, explicit dependencies, quarterly reviews -- will serve the organization better than a poorly structured roadmap built in a sophisticated purpose-built platform.
The technology consulting services from 137Foundry include technology strategy work that covers roadmap building and stakeholder alignment. PMI's frameworks for project portfolio management provide a complementary structure for managing the execution side of what appears on the roadmap. McKinsey's research on digital programs covers how leading organizations govern and review their technology roadmaps over time.
Top comments (0)