In 2024, Apple took what seemed like a historic step: allowing sideloading on iPhones for users in the European Union. Under pressure from the Digital Markets Act (DMA), iOS 17.4 introduced support for alternative app marketplaces, direct downloads via Safari, and a more transparent permission system for installs.
Yet, at the same time, Apple was quietly tightening the screws elsewhere. Enterprise certificates began vanishing in record numbers. Personal developer accounts faced new delays. From the 11th registered device onward, developers encountered a 24–72 hour approval wait, and revoked certificates were locked out from new devices for 14 days.
For third-party app platforms like TopStore and iOSGods, the result was devastating. Publicly installable apps became unreliable, certificate renewals unpredictable, and revenue models fragile.
On the surface, Apple’s behavior looks contradictory. But under the hood, it reveals a deliberate and calculated strategy.
Compliance vs. Control
The EU's DMA forced Apple to comply with demands for openness—but only where it had no choice. The changes introduced in iOS 17.4 are real, but geofenced. Only EU users can access third-party marketplaces. And those marketplaces must still meet Apple’s terms, pay a core technology fee, and pass notarization.
Meanwhile, outside the EU, Apple doubled down on enforcement. Sideloading via personal developer profiles or enterprise certificates—methods heavily used by independent platforms—are now riskier and less predictable than ever.
The Illusion of Openness
To Apple, sideloading isn’t inherently a problem. It’s sideloading that bypasses Apple’s control that poses the real threat.
In the EU, Apple retains that control by setting the rules for who can operate a third-party marketplace. Outside the EU, it eliminates gray-area distribution methods by changing certificate rules, silently adjusting review thresholds, and revoking dev accounts at scale.
The message is clear: sideloading is acceptable only when Apple dictates the terms.
Why Now?
There are two core motivations:
Revenue Protection
The App Store remains one of Apple’s most profitable businesses. Enterprise and personal cert abuse threaten that margin.
Narrative Control
Apple can now say, "We allow sideloading," while still ensuring 90% of the world uses only Apple-approved methods.
What It Means for the Ecosystem
TopStore, iOSGods, and similar platforms thrived in the legal gray zone between jailbreak and enterprise distribution. With Apple shutting that window, they’re left with few options:
Rely on Apple IDs and manual resigning (AltStore model)
Distribute raw IPAs for sideloaders
Pivot to EU-based storefronts (if possible)
Jailbreaking isn't coming back at scale. The real alternative is a distributed, semi-official sideloading ecosystem. But for now, Apple has made that path narrow and steep.
Final Thought
What looks like contradiction is actually strategy. Apple is doing the minimum necessary to comply with regulation—while investing heavily in preserving its global chokehold on distribution.
The sideloading wall hasn’t come down. For most of the world, Apple is just building it higher.
Top comments (0)