In the modern workplace, we most often focus on reducing the bus factor, but one-on-one partnerships/partner-in-crime can inspire leaders to see their role in nurturing resilient, high-performing teams.
1. The Tactical Advantage: Speed and Support
High-functioning partners develop a "short-hand." You don't need a 20-minute preamble; you can get straight to the "meat" of the problem because your partner already has the context.
- The Ultimate Sounding Board: Test radical ideas in a safe space before presenting them to the broader group.
- A Safety Net in Every Meeting: When a meeting gets heated, or you hit a technical wall, your partner steps in to provide context.
2. Real-World Resilience: When Life Happens
The real test of a partnership isn't when things are going well—it's when things get difficult. These two personal experiences illustrate how having a partner in crime can support you and affect your team/pod.
Case Study A: The Peer Proxy (Tech Lead + Tech Lead)
When I had to take sudden leave to help my mother with a health issue, I didn't even have to ask my partner—another Tech Lead—to help. He stepped in immediately. Because the team already viewed him as my "partner in crime," they trusted him implicitly. I could focus entirely on my family, knowing the team was on track, and my responsibilities were in the hands of capable people as capable as I was.
Case Study B: The Two-Year Anchor (Developer + PM)
A long-term family crisis tested this partnership. My father was ill for two years, and during that time, my PM was my rock. Our partnership survived a year-long gap while she was on maternity leave; once she returned, the partnership hadn't aged a day.
Two moments stand out that defined this partnership:
- The Meeting Shield: During a particularly diffcult time, I had a brief breakdown in a meeting. Without missing a beat, she took over the discussion and moved the agenda forward, giving me the space to collect myself and rejoin when I was ready.
- The Advocate: She helped me raise my situation to my manager and the POD to ensure I got the full support and flexibility I needed to balance work and family.
3. Developers are Partners, Not "Minions"
The most successful pods I’ve seen are built on shared ownership, which fosters a sense of value and commitment among developers and leaders alike.
Example 1: The "Minion" Model (Command and Control)
I once sat in a meeting where a Product Manager said, "Remember, developers, you work for me, so make sure everything comes through me." The moment that was said, the air left the room.
| Item | Description |
|---|---|
| Friction skyrocketed | It became an "us vs. them" dynamic. |
| The Dictatorship Feel | Meetings became heated and defensive. |
| The Blame Game | hen things went wrong, finger-pointing occurred immediately. Because there was no shared ownership, everyone looked for someone else to blame to protect themselves. |
| Chaos by Proxy | Last-minute requests became the norm, often arriving without any detail or "why." |
Example 2: The "Partner" Model (Co-Creation)
Twice in my career, I’ve seen the opposite. When the product team treats developers as equals from day one, they adopt a powerful mantra: "We rise and fall as one."
| Item | Description |
|---|---|
| Safe Discussions | Conversations are easy and focused on the issue, not titles. |
| Full Ownership | The team feels like they are part of the solution, not just the code. When things go wrong, they fix it together instead of looking for someone to blame. |
| Proactive Support | Team members jump in to create tickets or action items for each other. |
| The "Fun" Factor | The team is actually having fun because they aren't just working—they are winning together. |
Comparing the Two Worlds
| Feature | The "Minion" Model | The "Partner" Model |
|---|---|---|
| The Mindset | "You work for me." | "We rise and fall as one." |
| When things fail | Finger-pointing and blame. | Shared fixing and learning. |
| Communication | Top-down and filtered. | Equal, safe, and open. |
| Personal Crisis | Seen as a "blocker." | Met with advocacy and "taking the mic." |
| Longevity | Trust is fragile; high turnover. | Survives leaves and long-term challenges. |
4. A Note to Leadership: Embrace the Duo
There is sometimes a management instinct to rotate people frequently to "prevent silos." However, breaking up a high-performing partnership is often a strategic mistake.
| Item | Description |
|---|---|
| Trust is Faster than Process | Partners move quicker. |
| Institutional Knowledge | Partners act as two keepers of the flame, reducing the risk of knowledge loss. |
| Retention | People don't leave jobs; they leave people. When employees feel supported by a partner during life's hardest moments, their loyalty to the organization triples. |
5. Your Challenge: Who is your "Partner in Crime"?
Partnerships don't just happen; they are built through trust and shared wins. To foster this, consider observing which team members naturally collaborate and support each other, helping you identify existing or potential strategic alliances within your pod.
- Who is my sounding board?
- Who has my back in a meeting if I need to step away?
- Am I treating my cross-functional peers as equals or minions?
The Bottom Line: Don’t fear the duo. When two people find a rhythm that survives two years of life's challenges, the entire organization becomes more resilient, more efficient, and more human.
Top comments (0)