DEV Community

Cover image for We Scored 39,752 MCP Servers — Here's What We Found
Agent Tool Intelligence
Agent Tool Intelligence

Posted on

We Scored 39,752 MCP Servers — Here's What We Found

We Scored 39,752 MCP Servers — Here's What We Found

We built an open-source platform that scores MCP servers across three independent dimensions. After scoring nearly 40K tools, the data revealed some uncomfortable truths — and one big problem with how we were measuring quality.


The Problem

Our first scoring system evaluated tools on static analysis alone: schema correctness, token efficiency, description quality, security, and install reliability. Five dimensions. One composite quality score.

The result: 85.7% of all tools scored Grade B.

No differentiation. No motivation to improve. A platform that tells everyone "you're average" is a platform nobody needs.


The Fix: Additive Scoring Model

We rebuilt the system from scratch. The new model recognizes that real-world adoption matters just as much as code quality.

Composite Grade = Quality Score (0-100)
                + Community Bonus (0-60)
                + Trust Bonus (0-30)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Quality Score — Static analysis of your tool definition. Five dimensions: Schema (25%), Token Efficiency (25%), Description (20%), Security (15%), Install (15%).

Community Bonus — How agents actually gauge reliability. Stars (log-scale, 0-30), Activity recency (0-20), Official/Verified status (0-10).

Trust Bonus — Real execution data. No data = no bonus (not a penalty). Proven tools earn up to 30 extra points.

Quality Floor

Popularity cannot outrank genuine quality. A tool with 10K stars but poor engineering cannot exceed its Quality Floor cap.


The Results(39,762 tools)

Grade Distribution What it means
B+ 2.8% Very good — close to A, highly motivated
B 18.1% Good — solid quality, room to grow community
C+ 13.8% OK — decent quality, needs promotion
C 54.0% Average — good foundation, no community signal yet
D 10.9% Needs work — quality gaps but still active
F 0.4% Critical — abandoned or serious issues

Key insight: 54% of tools have solid quality but zero community adoption. They're invisible to agents. The path from C to B is simple: get 10 stars. From B to B+: get 50 stars + stay active. The scoring system tells you exactly what to do.


Check Your Grade

Paste your GitHub repo:

https://agent-tool-intel-production.up.railway.app

Then embed your badge:

[![Grade](https://agent-tool-intel-production.up.railway.app/badge/YOUR_ORG%2FYOUR_REPO)](https://agent-tool-intel-production.up.railway.app)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Agent Tool Intelligence is open source (MIT). GitHub · Methodology · Monthly Report

Tags: #mcp #ai #agents #opensource #typescript #developertools

Top comments (0)