Abstract Repository Combining Two/Multiple Repositories (OrderDocumentRepo)

In this approach, you create an OrderDocumentRepo that combines both the OrderRepo and DocumentRepo into a single abstract repository, managing the transaction within this repository.

Pros:

Single Responsibility: Encapsulates the entire transaction logic related to both orders and documents within a single repository, making it easy to manage.

Consistency: Ensures that both order and document operations are tightly coupled within the same transaction scope, reducing the risk of partial failures.

Cons:

Complexity: The repository becomes more complex as it handles more than one entity, potentially leading to a violation of the Single Responsibility Principle. Tight Coupling: Tightly couples OrderRepo and DocumentRepo, making it harder to reuse or test them independently.

Scalability: If more repositories need to be added to the transaction, the OrderDocumentRepo would have to be modified, reducing flexibility.

Best Practice:

This approach is suitable when the operations on orders and documents are always tied together and never operate independently.

It can be useful when you need to ensure consistency between two repositories that are closely related and where changes are always made in tandem.

Reference

akkaraponph / go-repo-abstract-repo-combining-pattern

🧐 (Complex & More Code) Abstract Repository Combining Two/Multiple Repositories (OrderDocumentRepo)

go-repo-abstract-repo-combining

Abstract Repository Combining Two/Multiple Repositories (OrderDocumentRepo)

In this approach, you create an OrderDocumentRepo that combines both the OrderRepo and DocumentRepo into a single abstract repository, managing the transaction within this repository.

Pros:

Single Responsibility: Encapsulates the entire transaction logic related to both orders and documents within a single repository, making it easy to manage.
Consistency: Ensures that both order and document operations are tightly coupled within the same transaction scope, reducing the risk of partial failures.

Cons:

Complexity: The repository becomes more complex as it handles more than one entity, potentially leading to a violation of the Single Responsibility Principle Tight Coupling: Tightly couples OrderRepo and DocumentRepo, making it harder to reuse or test them independently.
Scalability: If more repositories need to be added to the transaction, the OrderDocumentRepo would have to be modified, reducing flexibility.

Best Practice: