The word of the day is "fancy"... so here's a cartoon of a fancy-looking British gentleman with a hat, a monocle, and an umbrella:
There's ...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Whoop whoop another video - time to go learn some more stuff!
Also your entry today is...spiffing! (coming from a Brit!)
The entry is peng innit bruv
Bruh, I’m old school so it is “lit” or “banging”, I don’t get this peng and bear malarkey 🤣
I'm too old... Is "peng" a thing? I thought they were asking if it was a PNG 😳
Haha, peng is attractive I believe or something similar! 🤣 PNG I understand though! ❤️
🤣
Thanks!
why you always set the gradient, position and sizes using their properties ? 🤔 I found it difficult to manage that way.
Why not using the syntax
background:gradient position / size , ...?I updated it following the shorthand notation. I guess it still takes some time to get used to it, but at the moment I have mixed feelings about it: It is definitely cleaner and more organized than having the background images, sizes, and positions separated... but at the same time, I find it more difficult to follow, especially for people that may not be used to that notation (like me 😓).
Yes for sure it will be difficult if you are already used to the longhand one. You are not the only one by the way, Lynn also use that notation. I don't know how you can easily find the position or the size for each gradient .. It would take me forever to find the correct one 😖
Also, this made me remember one reason why I didn't do the shorthand notation more often: I don't know why, I would expect "image size / position" (or "image size position") instead of "image position / size" and it puts me off a little.
Because I'm a dodo and got used to the long notation 😳
I will try the shorthand notation, it will help making things easier and save me some time looking for things. Thanks for the recommendation.
Pinkys out
Pinkies out!
I'm so smart that I changed the original without realizing I hadn't forked it before 🤦