The algorithm is rarely the bottleneck.
The data almost always is.
You can have the most sophisticated model architecture published in the latest research paper. If your data is biased, incomplete, or insufficient โ the model will fail.
And the reverse holds:
A simple model trained on excellent data will frequently outperform a complex model trained on mediocre data.
This is the truth that separates practitioners from spectators:
๐น Practitioners obsess over data quality.
๐น Spectators obsess over model architecture.
Here's what "obsessing over data" actually means:
๐น Is there enough of it? (Volume)
๐น Does it represent the real world? (Variety)
๐น Is it accurate and consistent? (Quality)
๐น Is it labeled correctly? (Annotation)
๐น Does it actually relate to the problem? (Relevance)
๐น Is it free from historical bias? (Fairness)
Six questions. All of them about data. None of them about algorithms.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐น ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฒ๐ป๐ด๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐๐ฎ ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ณ๐๐ฒ๐น.
An engine without fuel is a sculpture.
Spend 80% of your effort on the fuel.
The engine is the easy part.
Day 4 of 20. Tomorrow: Why "we need AI" is the most expensive sentence in tech.
Top comments (0)