DEV Community

AutoMate AI
AutoMate AI

Posted on

AI Meeting Notes: I Tested 7 Tools So You Don't Have To

I hate taking meeting notes. My attention splits between listening and typing. I miss things. The notes are incomplete.

So I tried every AI meeting assistant I could find. Here's what actually works.

The Contenders

  1. Fireflies.ai
  2. Otter.ai
  3. Fathom
  4. tl;dv
  5. Grain
  6. Avoma
  7. Read.ai

Each one used for at least 10 meetings. Real calls, not test runs.

What I Actually Need

Before the reviews, my requirements:

  • Accurate transcription (not just "pretty good")
  • Good summaries (not just bullet-pointing everything)
  • Action item extraction (who does what)
  • Searchable archive (find that thing from 3 months ago)
  • Integrations (Slack, Notion, CRM)
  • Not creepy (I don't want a robot face on my call)

The Results

Fireflies.ai — Best Overall

Price: $10-19/month

Accuracy: 92-95%. Best among all tested. Even handles accents well.

Summaries: Excellent. Breaks into overview, action items, key topics.

What I like:

  • Joins calls invisibly (no bot avatar)
  • Great search across all meetings
  • Slack integration actually works
  • Can ask questions about past meetings

What I don't:

  • Mobile app is mediocre
  • Occasional lag in processing

Best for: Anyone who wants set-and-forget meeting notes.

Otter.ai — Best Free Tier

Price: Free for 300 min/month, $17/month for unlimited

Accuracy: 88-92%. Slightly below Fireflies.

Summaries: Good, but more verbose than necessary.

What I like:

  • Generous free tier
  • Real-time transcription (you can see it during the call)
  • Good for interviews (speaker separation works)

What I don't:

  • Summaries are too long
  • Enterprise features are expensive
  • Sometimes misses speaker changes

Best for: Budget-conscious users, interviewers.

Fathom — Best for Sales Calls

Price: Free (limited), $24-39/month

Accuracy: 90-93%. Good but not market-leading.

Summaries: Excellent for sales context. Extracts objections, next steps, competitor mentions.

What I like:

  • Sales-specific intelligence
  • CRM integrations (Salesforce, HubSpot)
  • Coaches you on talk-to-listen ratio
  • Clip sharing is smooth

What I don't:

  • Overkill for non-sales meetings
  • More expensive than alternatives

Best for: Sales teams, anyone doing discovery calls.

tl;dv — Best for Async Teams

Price: Free (limited), $20/month

Accuracy: 88-91%.

Summaries: Good, with timestamps for easy reference.

What I like:

  • Timestamped highlights (share specific moments)
  • Great for distributed teams
  • Recording quality is high
  • Notion/Slack integrations

What I don't:

  • Search isn't as powerful as Fireflies
  • Free tier is quite limited

Best for: Async-first teams, product teams doing user interviews.

Grain — Best for Clips

Price: Free (limited), $19/month

Accuracy: 87-90%.

Summaries: Decent, nothing special.

What I like:

  • Best clip creation experience
  • Easy to share "here's what they said" moments
  • Good for testimonial collection

What I don't:

  • Transcription accuracy lags behind
  • Summary quality inconsistent

Best for: Marketing teams collecting testimonials, user research.

Avoma — Best Enterprise

Price: $24-79/month

Accuracy: 91-94%.

Summaries: Highly customizable. Can train it on your terminology.

What I like:

  • Revenue intelligence features
  • Custom vocabulary training
  • Strong admin controls
  • Compliance features

What I don't:

  • Expensive
  • Setup takes time
  • Overkill for small teams

Best for: Large sales orgs, companies with compliance needs.

Read.ai — Most Interesting Concept

Price: Free, $20/month for premium

Accuracy: 85-88% (weakest).

Summaries: Unique focus on meeting quality metrics.

What I like:

  • Meeting quality scores (engagement, talk time balance)
  • Coach-like feedback
  • Interesting analytics over time

What I don't:

  • Transcription accuracy not great
  • Sometimes feels gimmicky
  • Limited integrations

Best for: Managers wanting to improve meeting culture.

My Actual Setup

Primary: Fireflies.ai ($19/month)

  • Joins all scheduled calls automatically
  • Sends summary to Slack
  • Archives everything searchable

Secondary: Fathom (free tier)

  • Sales calls only
  • CRM integration
  • Objection tracking

Total cost: $19/month for complete coverage.

The Privacy Question

All these tools record your calls. Consider:

  • Are participants aware? (Most jurisdictions require consent)
  • Where's data stored?
  • Who can access recordings?
  • Can you delete on request?

I start calls with "This call will be recorded and transcribed for notes. Everyone okay with that?"

No one has ever said no.

Tips for Better Results

1. Good audio matters. Use a decent mic. Background noise kills accuracy.

2. Say names. "Sarah, what do you think?" helps with speaker identification.

3. Speak clearly. Not slowly, just clearly. Enunciate.

4. Review summaries initially. Train yourself to trust it, but verify for the first few weeks.

5. Use the search. The real value is in the archive. "What did we decide about pricing in that March call?"

ROI Calculation

My meeting load: ~15 meetings/week

Before AI notes:

  • 15 min writing notes per meeting
  • Total: 15 × 15 = 225 min/week = 3.75 hours

After AI notes:

  • 2 min reviewing summary per meeting
  • Total: 15 × 2 = 30 min/week

Time saved: 3+ hours/week

At $100/hour, that's $1,300/month saved for a $19 investment.

The math works.


My complete workflow for meeting notes — including how I integrate with Notion, process action items, and search across months of meetings — is in AI Automation Blueprint 2026. $29 for the full productivity stack.

Top comments (0)