In their v4.9, the TypeScript team is releasing a new operator: satisfies (see blog post https://devblogs.microsoft.com/typescript/announcing-typescript-4-9-beta/#the-satisfies-operator).
Purpose
The purpose of satisfies is to enforce a constraint on a variable, without changing its type.
For instance, you want to say that a color is "either a string, or a RGB tuple", which would give something like that:
type RGB = readonly [red: number, green: number, blue: number];
type Color = { value: RGB | string };
const myColor: Color = { value 'red' };
But now, we don't know whether myColor.value is a string or a tuple. So we cannot do something like myColor.value.toUpperCase() (even if it's actually a string).
In TS 4.9, it'll be possible to do this (TypeScript Playground):
type RGB = readonly [red: number, green: number, blue: number];
type Color = { value: RGB | string };
const myColor = { value: 'red' } satisfies Color; // works
const myIncorrectColor = { value: 100 } satisfies Color; // throws error
myColor.value.toUpperCase(); // valid operation as myColor is a string
Combining as const and satisfies
As expected, you combine as const and satisfies (TypeScript Playground).
type RGB = readonly [red: number, green: number, blue: number];
type Color = RGB | string;
const palette = {
red: [255, 0, 0],
green: "#00ff00",
blue: [1,2,3],
} satisfies Record<string, Color>;
console.log(palette.green);
// ^? green is string
const constantPalette = {
red: [255, 0, 0],
green: "#00ff00",
blue: [1,2,3],
} as const satisfies Record<string, Color>;
console.log(constantPalette.green);
// ^? green is "#00ff00"
Note: the order matters. While as const satisfies <type> works, the opposite isn't true: satisfies <type> as const will throw a TS error (TypeScript Playground):
type RGB = readonly [red: number, green: number, blue: number];
type Color = RGB | string;
const invalidPalette = {
red: [255, 0, 0],
green: "#00ff00",
blue: [1,2,3],
} satisfies Record<string, string | RGB> as const; // throws an error
Top comments (9)
Hi. I think your example does not fully explain the need of
satisfies. At least my VS Code & TypeScript compiler is happy with the following example:It also works on TypeScript Playground.
You're right, in this case TS is able to properly infer the type
string. I had a more complex example in my previous draft, but I tried to make it simpler for the blog post (and I didn't try the new version 😬)Try with this piece of code:
In this case, TS will use the type
Colorforvalueand notstring.See playground
You can also try in TS 4.9
type RGB = readonly [red: number, green: number, blue: number];why is
readonlyused in this instance?what actually is the result type? an array of strings or some type of enum? eg
["red": 1, "green": 2]could you explain more why:
so if
myColorcan be a string OR an RGB, how is it always going to work with the.toUpperCase? Would that not fail on the tuple type of RGB?It's used because using
as conston an array creates a readonly tuple. So I had to use it to make the 2 types compatible.That's the point of
satisfies: it won't be a string or a RGB: when you doconst myColor = 'red',myColorwill have the typestring.Adding
satisfies Colordoesn't change its type, but instead checks that it can be casted into aColor. And indeed,stringcan be casted (but won't be casted) as aRGB | string.So as
myColorstays a string, TS won't throw an error onmyColor.toUpperCase()But hypothetically, then, you have an RGB type which satisfies the requirements for the Color type; what actually happens when you try to run
.toUpperCase()?At the end of the day,
type Color = RGB | stringis really just saying that anything stored as aColorshould either be aRGBor astring. And, usingsatisfiesis supposed to put us in a position where we can be confident that it's safe to use string methods or methods specific to areadonly array(RGB) should work or have some standard behavior across allColorinstances. I don't really understand how that works or how that's supposed to be handled.As the types are stripped away in the runtime, it'd be regular JS:
becomes
so it'd just apply
toUpperCase()to'red', returning'RED'.satisfiesdoesn't change the type ofmyColor. It just checks that the type of the variable can be assimilated as another one. You can think about it as:It'd be a tuple of 3 numbers, something like:
Adding
readonlywill only tell TS that you cannot push / mutate its content. And thered,green,blueis just to gave labels to the 3 values (hints on the values).See devblogs.microsoft.com/typescript/...
This is actually quite nice and addresses a personal painpoint for me.
Cool, just wondering how this feature can be helpful, If there are two possible types for a property, so it's better the code handles both scenarios.
To me it's against the premise of TS even, unless I'm missing something.