November 11, 2025
If Bitcoin Were Born in 2023, Would It Even Get Listed?
Probably not.
At least not on the big-name exchanges.
Maybe on a few smaller ones—if it stuck around long enough and proved it wasn’t just another flash-in-the-chain.
Imagine This…
It’s August 2023.
Someone anonymous drops a whitepaper online titled Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.
They upload the code to GitHub, mine the first block, and say:
“Anyone can join. No team, no company. Just pure decentralization.”
It’s a throwback to 2009.
But the crypto world isn’t the same.
It’s no longer a playground for rebels—it’s a polished, investor-driven machine with rules, gatekeepers, and expectations.
So… Could This New Bitcoin Get Listed?
Highly unlikely.
Because today’s exchanges aren’t just places to trade—they’re profit-focused businesses.
And they make money in two major ways:
- Trading fees (especially on leveraged bets)
- New listings—which often come with hefty, hidden price tags
While most exchanges claim they don’t charge listing fees, reports and insider chatter say otherwise.
The costs are buried in “marketing partnerships,” liquidity guarantees, or market-making deals.
Now Picture This New Bitcoin
- No company
- No PR team
- No budget
- Can’t pay a $500,000 onboarding fee
- Can’t promise deep liquidity
- Can’t even offer an email for compliance
From the exchange’s view?
It’s not just risky—it’s a dead end.
No upside. No buzz.
No one to call if regulators start asking questions.
What About the Big Exchanges?
Coinbase?
Almost certainly not.
They want legal entities, transparency, and venture capital backing.
Anonymous creators? A nonstarter.
Binance?
Slightly more flexible—but they still expect a team, a foundation, and a marketing push.
And by “marketing push,” they don’t mean organic growth.
They mean:
- Paid ads
- Trading competitions
- Influencers on TikTok, YouTube, and Twitter
- Coordinated hype the moment you list
That takes money. And central control.
Neither of which a decentralized project has.
Now Compare: What If XRP Launched in 2023?
It would’ve been listed everywhere within months.
Why? Because it’s built like a Silicon Valley startup, not a cypherpunk experiment:
- Real company (Ripple)
- Known team with real names
- Pre-mined supply they control
- Deep ties to banks and investors
When an exchange asks for a “marketing push,” XRP can deliver:
They hold billions of coins in reserve, so they can easily hand over hundreds of thousands to fund promotions, airdrops, or pay influencers.
But 2023 Bitcoin can’t do any of that.
There’s no central wallet.
No marketing budget.
No PR agency.
Every coin is issued fairly through mining—and already scattered across thousands of users.
No one owns a big stash.
No one speaks for the network.
And Satoshi? Long gone.
So Who Gets a Shot—and Who Gets Ignored?
While VC-backed tokens get fast-tracked—because they raised millions from Andreessen Horowitz or Sequoia—truly decentralized projects get ignored.
Not because they’re broken.
But because they refuse to play the game.
Is There Any Hope?
Kraken is the closest thing to a maybe.
They’ve listed fair-launch projects before (Monero, for example).
But even they would wait:
- A year or two of uptime
- Real miners
- Solid code
- Someone—anyone—to answer basic questions (not to control, just to communicate)
OKX or Bybit might be more open.
They care less about backstory and more about real usage.
If people are mining, trading, and building? They might list it.
But even they expect some liquidity or volume—which is hard to build without a listing in the first place.
It’s a catch-22.
The Bigger Picture
Bitcoin got lucky.
It launched before exchanges became gatekeepers, before tokenomics decks, and before listing became a paid privilege.
Today’s system is built to onboard startups, not movements.
It rewards projects that look like tech companies—with CEOs, legal teams, investor pitch decks, and influencer contracts.
It wasn’t designed for something that says:
“I don’t need your permission.”
But That Doesn’t Mean It’s Impossible
If this new Bitcoin:
- Survives for years
- Keeps mining blocks
- Attracts real users
- Builds a small group of long-term supporters who can talk to exchanges (without taking control)
…then it could start on decentralized platforms like Uniswap.
From there, it might earn enough attention to get picked up by Kraken or OKX.
It’s a slow grind.
Quiet.
Unprofitable—for everyone except the users.
And Maybe That’s the Point
Because if it survives without paying a dime or naming a founder, it proves something powerful:
Real decentralization doesn’t ask for a seat at the table. It builds its own.
And what does that mean?
- The community runs the nodes.
- Miners secure the network—not investors.
- Developers contribute because they believe in it—not because they’re on payroll.
- People trade it peer-to-peer, long before any big exchange notices.
Over time, that creates a parallel economy—one that doesn’t need approval to exist.
The “table” isn’t one room with a few chairs.
It’s wherever people choose to gather, transact, and trust the code.
And if enough people do that?
Eventually, the gatekeepers have to turn around and ask:
“Wait—how do we get in?”
**当然！以下是文章标题的中文翻译，简洁有力，适合直接复制粘贴：
如果比特币诞生于2023年，它还能上交易所吗？
Top comments (0)