The fact that the way I communicate with people is that I usually work on deductive thinking. When I make a decision, I follow my intuition, collecting data, and test it. However, When I met the person following Inductive Reasoning, and have certain reasons to behave, I feel overwhelmed.
Not only programming, Everything combines with communication at the workplace. I did not know my system. Ignorance was not a problem, I now aware. And, I want to ask, what I want, I want to discuss, what it is, and want to really learn correctly.
We live in diversity. I might not be able to notice my deductive thinking unless I try to face an inductive thinking person, they were telling me 'what is my purpose' and I replied, 'I am figuring out'. Literally, I was discovering what my statement needs the reasons, and now it constructed.
After the short term of studying at Bootcamp, I had the time of recovering back to study computer science, ahead of that, I needed to prepare to talk to a new type of people, to work on the opposite side of a web developer world, and stand for non-violence conversation! Honestly, It is for my mental health.
I feel more comfortable listening to people's lives and reflecting on their topics in my life. I am relearning to show my story. It is still uncomfortable. When I talk to people, I want to have the essence, which is the same as information. Meeting up computer science might be meant to be for me, but, for a better coworking, sometimes, It is necessary to tell the evident story.
Ah, too bad I am familiar with math problems. Math gave me the second chance to challenge, programming. I wanted to give up programming sincerely. Now I realized that there has nothing to change myself to fit in them, validating how I think is important and I became to respect my deductive thinking, it makes me curious unstoppable, broke my math trauma, give me a different view of a lifestyle, and forgave my mistakes. I am going to use inductive thinking this time! For sure, based on my intuition, Coloring on the program just motivates a lot!
Deductive reasoning, also deductive logic, is the process of reasoning from one or more statements (premises) to reach a logical conclusion.
Deductive reasoning goes in the same direction as that of the conditionals and links premises with conclusions. If all premises are true, the terms are clear, and the rules of deductive logic are followed, then the conclusion reached is necessarily true.
Deductive reasoning ("top-down logic") contrasts with inductive reasoning ("bottom-up logic") in the following way; in deductive reasoning, a conclusion is reached reductively by applying general rules which hold over the entirety of a closed domain of discourse, narrowing the range under consideration until only the conclusion(s) is left (there is no epistemic uncertainty; i.e. unrecognized parts of the currently available set; all parts of the currently available set are available and recognized). In inductive reasoning, the conclusion is reached by generalizing or extrapolating from specific cases to general rules, i.e., there is epistemic uncertainty (unrecognized parts of the currently available set). However, the inductive reasoning mentioned here is not the same as induction used in mathematical proofs – mathematical induction is actually a form of deductive reasoning.
Deductive reasoning differs from abductive reasoning by the direction of the reasoning relative to the conditionals. Deductive reasoning goes in the same direction as that of the conditionals, whereas abductive reasoning goes in the opposite direction to that of the conditionals.
Thanks to Deductive Reasoning