I'm a small business programmer. I love solving tough problems with Python and PHP. If you like what you're seeing, you should probably follow me here on dev.to and then checkout my blog.
I used NASA's standard because anyone can look at it for free, which is not the case for IEC 61508 or ISO 26262.
I have no idea how these ML/AI systems are being installed, certified, and sold in cars as safe. My best friend was nearly killed twice in one day by one of these systems. In the first case his car veered into oncoming traffic. And in the second case the adaptive cruise control would have driven him right into the car in front of him had he not intervened and turned it off.
He pulled over and found snow had collected in front of the sensors. The car didn't warn him about questionable sensor reading, or refuse to engage those features. It just executed its algorithm assuming the sensors were correct. Not very safe behavior in my opinion.
Good point about the cost of saving one life. I've read it's different from industry to industry and from country to country. I believe nuclear and avionics in the US put the highest value on a life in the data I saw.
Max is a life enhancer for tech & entrepreneurship. Which seeks to blend both to build innovative products or services for the world that solves hard problems.
Ahhh... now I understand the why you choose it. Since a module of mine is based on that particular standard in my university. Plus it's really a niche subject that my professor shared to the class. He has to go to China or Singapore from time to time to teach due to the lack of it. Despite its really important especially you are implementing in the area you had mentioned.
As much as I want to have a self driving car to fetch me to move from point A to point B. Till now I'm in the same thinking as my professor of having to drive it myself or grab a taxi.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
All good points.
I used NASA's standard because anyone can look at it for free, which is not the case for IEC 61508 or ISO 26262.
I have no idea how these ML/AI systems are being installed, certified, and sold in cars as safe. My best friend was nearly killed twice in one day by one of these systems. In the first case his car veered into oncoming traffic. And in the second case the adaptive cruise control would have driven him right into the car in front of him had he not intervened and turned it off.
He pulled over and found snow had collected in front of the sensors. The car didn't warn him about questionable sensor reading, or refuse to engage those features. It just executed its algorithm assuming the sensors were correct. Not very safe behavior in my opinion.
Good point about the cost of saving one life. I've read it's different from industry to industry and from country to country. I believe nuclear and avionics in the US put the highest value on a life in the data I saw.
Ahhh... now I understand the why you choose it. Since a module of mine is based on that particular standard in my university. Plus it's really a niche subject that my professor shared to the class. He has to go to China or Singapore from time to time to teach due to the lack of it. Despite its really important especially you are implementing in the area you had mentioned.
As much as I want to have a self driving car to fetch me to move from point A to point B. Till now I'm in the same thinking as my professor of having to drive it myself or grab a taxi.