Different minds only help when they share one brief

I kept running into the same failure mode with multi-AI coding: discussion in one chat, build in another tool, and the next change request starts from a cold paste.

Context drops. Review becomes guesswork.

A better pattern is visible and boring:

1. Keep the brief next to the work
2. Discuss trade-offs against that brief
3. Build from one shared goal
4. Review independently before publishing

Independent verification is separate from the draft. Publishing needs explicit human approval.

That is the workflow Brainstorm is built around: multi-AI discussion → task split → reviewable source → continue from an existing project candidate.

Model usage stays with your own eligible accounts. The license does not sell model credits.