DEV Community

Caleb Rhodes
Caleb Rhodes

Posted on

111 Links for Launching or Listing Your Product Beyond Product Hunt

#marketing #product #saas #startup

I keep this working list for the unglamorous part of a launch: finding places where I can list, share, or promote a product. It contains 111 URLs across 110 unique domains. The numbers differ because Launch List appears twice, once as its homepage and once as a live Groniz listing. I kept both so you can compare the directory with an actual product page.

"Product Hunt alternatives" is convenient shorthand, but it is a loose description of this list. Product Hunt's official launch guide describes a free, community-based platform built around product submissions, voting, comments, and sharing. Most of the sites below are not Product Hunt clones. Some have a launch feed or maker community. Others are SaaS directories, AI tool catalogs, or discovery services. I would use them alongside a Product Hunt launch, not as interchangeable replacements.

The four groups are my filing system, not ratings. Two sites in the same section can have different audiences and submission processes, and I may not value them equally. The list itself is free, but third-party submissions may not be. A site may also close submissions, use a review queue, change its rules, or reject a listing. Link attributes can change. I check the current page before investing time or money.

Launch platforms and maker communities (38)

I start here for a time-bound launch, early feedback, or visibility among other builders. Still, I care more about audience fit than the word "launch" in a domain name.

Startup and SaaS directories (21)

These sites cover startup listings, SaaS products, and founder stories. I put the ones closest to my actual users at the top of my shortlist.

AI and software tool directories (39)

This group is for AI products, developer tools, extensions, and general software. I read the categories before submitting. A focused catalog may fit my product better than a larger directory that covers everything.

Launch helpers and specialized discovery sites (12)

This group is the mixed drawer: submission help, link-focused discovery, marketplaces, location-oriented listings, and other specialist services. I inspect each offer on its own instead of treating the whole group as another batch of directories.

How I would turn 110 domains into a launch plan

A list this long can turn into procrastination with a spreadsheet attached. Bulk submission is the other temptation. My preference is a short list and a series of manageable waves.

Before opening a form, I decide what I want that wave to do. That may be finding beta users, collecting feedback, reaching a specific buyer group, or creating a lasting product profile. Each goal points to different sites. A maker community may be worth my time for the critique even if it sends few qualified signups. A niche directory may also justify the work with modest traffic when its visitors closely match the product. Picking the job first keeps my shortlist honest.

1. Prepare one reusable submission packet

I keep one source document with the product name, canonical URL, one-sentence pitch, short and long descriptions, category, pricing summary, founder bio, contact address, logo, screenshots, and a short demo. I also note the exact problem, intended user, and useful outcome. Otherwise the copy starts to drift as I squeeze the same idea into different character limits.

This packet is a starting point, not copy I paste into every form. I adapt the opening sentence, category, and proof for the audience. If a directory asks for a claim I cannot support, I leave it out.

2. Shortlist by audience fit

I choose 10 to 20 sites first, not all 110. For each one, I check whether it serves my buyer, other makers, or mainly people collecting tools. Then I look for recent activity in my category and decide whether the effort makes sense at this stage.

I also check the current submission rules, cost, review process, and whether the site still operates. Promised traffic, "dofollow" labels, and third-party authority scores do not settle whether a site is relevant. None guarantees visits, rankings, or customers.

3. Track each submission as an experiment

My tracker has one row per domain. I record the category, audience hypothesis, submission URL, current rules, cost, review state, date submitted, tracking URL, live listing URL, and notes. I keep "submitted," "under review," "approved," "rejected," and "live" separate. A full spreadsheet can feel productive while hiding how little has gone live.

When a listing goes live, I save the public URL and read the copy again. I use a dedicated UTM source when the destination permits tracking parameters, while keeping the canonical product URL consistent everywhere else.

4. Submit in waves

I send the first wave to five or ten high-fit sites, see what gets accepted, and adjust the packet before sending the next one. A small wave exposes weak screenshots, unclear positioning, broken links, or category mistakes while I can still fix them without much rework.

I coordinate listings with my own launch distribution because I do not expect directories to carry the campaign. This SaaS product launch social media plan covers how to sequence launch-day posts, follow-ups, and proof after the first announcement.

5. Measure the path beyond the click

I compare referred visits, signups, signup rate, and activation by source and wave. For a paid product, I also follow qualified trials and conversions over a longer window. The sample is often small. I treat the result as directional evidence rather than pretending every difference is conclusive.

I use the same measurement definitions for directories and social posts. This guide to social media metrics for SaaS connects reach and clicks to signups, activation, and revenue signals.

6. Keep automation supervised

Automation can maintain the tracker, resize assets, or draft variants from the approved packet. I do not let it submit identical copy blindly to every form. Site rules, categories, fees, and required fields change. One automated mistake copied across 100 forms leaves me with 100 mistakes to clean up. I review each submission and stop spending time on sources that show no relevant visits or activation after a fair test.

Once the listings are underway, I still distribute the launch through channels I control. Groniz can publish or schedule from an AI agent or Console across 32+ networks, with capabilities varying by provider. See the supported agent workflows.

Top comments (0)