DEV Community

Carrie
Carrie

Posted on

WAF Showdown: Real Deployment Costs Compared

#waf #cybersecurity #websecurity #selfhosted

When it comes to protecting web applications from attacks, a Web Application Firewall (WAF) is non-negotiable. But most developers and DevOps teams overlook one key factor: the real deployment cost, not just the sticker price. In this article, I’ll break down the practical costs of deploying different WAFs—including cloud-based solutions and self-hosted alternatives like SafeLine WAF.

Why Deployment Costs Matter

Most WAF vendors advertise monthly or annual license fees. But if you’ve ever deployed a WAF, you know the true costs include:

  • Server resources: CPU, RAM, disk space
  • Bandwidth: traffic filtering overhead
  • Maintenance: patching, logs rotation, and monitoring
  • Team hours: configuring rules, integrating with CI/CD, and troubleshooting

Let’s see how this plays out in practice.

Cloud WAFs (e.g., Cloudflare, AWS WAF)

WAF License / Plan Practical Notes
Cloudflare Pro $20/mo Easy setup, but scaling costs rise fast with QPS. Cloudflare doesn’t expose server-side logs.
Cloudflare Enterprise Custom Full features, bot management, DDoS mitigation. Requires significant Ops hours for API integration.
AWS WAF Pay-as-you-go Billing based on rules count and web requests. Complex to tune; server-side control limited.

Pros:

  • Zero infra management
  • CDN integration
  • Auto-scaling

Cons:

  • Limited observability
  • Potentially expensive at high traffic
  • Vendor lock-in

Self-Hosted WAF (SafeLine WAF Example)

SafeLine is a self-hosted WAF. You deploy it on your own servers (on-prem or cloud VM), giving you full control and visibility. Here’s what a practical deployment looks like:

# On a 4-core, 8GB RAM server
docker compose up -d
# Monitor logs
tail -f /data/safeline/logs/nginx/safeline/access.log
# Adjust custom rules
vi /data/safeline/conf/rules/custom.conf
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Practical Cost Breakdown

Pros:

  • Full control over logs & rules
  • No hidden scaling costs
  • Can deploy anywhere (AWS, GCP, DigitalOcean, on-prem )

Cons:

  • Initial setup requires Ops knowledge
  • Maintenance is on you

⸻

Tips for Practitioners

  1. Estimate traffic before picking a plan: Cloud WAF costs can explode with high QPS.
  2. Monitor logs aggressively: With self-hosted WAFs, use tail + alert scripts for attacks.
  3. Test custom rules in staging: Avoid blocking legitimate users.
  4. Consider hybrid setups: CDN for caching + SafeLine for backend protection.

⸻

Conclusion

Choosing a WAF isn’t just about the monthly fee. Server costs, ops hours, and traffic patterns matter. For teams that want full control, predictable costs, and deep observability, SafeLine WAF is a strong contender.

For cloud convenience with lower initial friction, Cloudflare and AWS WAF are solid, but expect costs to scale with traffic.

⸻

Have you tried self-hosted WAFs? Share your experiences in the comments or on Discord – let’s talk real deployment costs!

SafeLine Website: https://ly.safepoint.cloud/ShZAy9x
Live Demo: https://demo.waf.chaitin.com:9443/statistics
Discord: https://discord.gg/dy3JT7dkmY
Doc: https://docs.waf.chaitin.com/en/home
Github: https://github.com/chaitin/SafeLine

Top comments (0)