DEV Community

Cover image for Storybook Actions in Action
chantastic
chantastic

Posted on • Originally published at chan.dev

Storybook Actions in Action

Let's talk about console.log-driven development. We all do it. So, instead of fighting it, let's upgrade it with Storybook Actions.

Feature instability and mitigations

Storybook actions are a feature of Storybook 6 and 7.

There's an active design proposal to make them work like conventional testing mocks. This would be a welcome change, imo.

Knowing that a change is on the horizon, let's focus on the features of the current API that will remain (or migrate easily with codemods).

Feature Overview

In a fresh Storybook 7 installation (sandboxes here), we find two example components configured to use Storybook actions.

The included Button stories log the common event — onClick — when clicked. Logs can then be expanded to show full event details.

Story for Button that has been clicked. The Actions tab shows a logged onClick common event. This includes the React Event details

​Heading stories also log events but this time with custom events onLogin and onCreateAccount. These events are logged when the respective buttons are clicked.

Story for Heading that has had Login and Sign up buttons clicked. The Actions tab shows a logged onLogin and onCreateAccount custom events. These include the React Event details

Actions pair perfectly with Storybook interactions. Interactions are a way to document component states thru simulated user input. Interactions trigger their corresponding actions.

Story for Page that has had Login and Sign up buttons. The Log in button was clicked via Storybook interactions (play function), using testing-library/dom. The Interactions tab shows that the event was executed. And the Actions tab shows that the callback was called, with the React Event details.

Add actions with argTypes

Let's define actions for the example Button component.

  • Open the story file and locate component meta.

  • Add an argTypes property if one doesn't exist.

  • Add an onClick property (this needs to match the component prop name).

  • Set the value to { action: "clicked" }. (The logged text can be anything we like.)

// Button.stories.tsx
// (surronding code omitted)
const meta = {
  title: "Example/Button",
  component: Button,
  tags: ["autodocs"],
  argTypes: {
    backgroundColor: { control: "color" },
    onClick: { action: "onClick" },
  },
} satisfies Meta<typeof Button>;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Now click your button in Storybook and watch the Actions log!

Animated gif of React Events being logged as the Button story is clicked

Test actions with interactions

Let's add an interaction to the example Button component.

  • Create or find a new story.

  • Add a play function to the story object.

  • Within the canvasElement, find the button.

  • then simulate a click event.

// Button.stories.tsx
// (surronding code omitted)
export const Primary: Story = {
  args: {
    primary: true,
    label: "Button",
  },
  play: async ({ canvasElement }) => {
    const canvas = within(canvasElement);
    const button = await canvas.getByRole("button", {
      name: /Button/i,
    });
    await userEvent.click(button);
  },
};
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Now the story will run the interaction when it loads. Logging both the interaction and the action — in their respective tabs.

Image of an interaction story that automatically plays a user event over a story. An interaction is logged and an 1 action is showing as logged in the Actions tab.

Lessons learned

console.log-driven development is something I do when driving out a component implementation. It's a quick, cheap way to ensure that events are hooked up (early in the process).

But log statements has one huge drawback: they live in component code. And I'm guilty of pushing a log (or a few dozen) into production.

Storybook actions let you validate implementation in story files, leaving component code alone.

Top comments (0)