For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Speedy emails, satisfied customers
Are delayed transactional emails costing you user satisfaction? Postmark delivers your emails almost instantly, keeping your customers happy and connected.
Read next
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70600/70600294afc8c5bd1227b3253709f6bd02fe8ad3" alt="grbeno profile image"
Using React as Static Files in Django: Step-by-Step Guide
grbeno -
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d031b/d031b18ff9ef94f7d07985f97738cf3f4a01002d" alt="joaosc17 profile image"
Testing a GraphQL Application with Jest and SuperTest
João Costa -
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c71a2/c71a2a5a9fd8428b6a90adbdaca058837eff3a1d" alt="signadot profile image"
Why Quick Fixes Fail: Rethinking Microservices Testing
Signadot -
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41c82/41c82b92eb365171cb8270ffec71f8317b46cb10" alt="fabbuilder profile image"
Static React App Deployment with Vite
FAB Builder | Code Generation -
Top comments (7)
What was wrong with enzyme?
Nothing really, we figured we could get much more value out of using testing library because we could actually test out how a user would interact with our app other than just using our usual snapshot tests.
I used to use Enzyme for a long time in my projects. However, now it is on deprecation path and will not be compatible with future versions of React. Therefore, I decided to write a tool that will help me and my team to migrate our projects to RTL. Check my article: dev.to/srshifu/migrate-away-from-e...
It has links to the tool you can download and use in your project
why you prefer react testing library over enzyme ?
We are able to tests components in isolation easily and as a potential user would actually use our application
I did the same, I am a happier person now ;)
I’ve never been happier too