About two years ago, I was sitting in a meeting where everyone agreed on one thing:
"We need more candidates."
It sounded obvious.
The role had been open for weeks, interviews weren't converting, and the pipeline looked thin. Someone suggested partnering with another recruitment agency. Another person wanted to spend more on job ads.
Everyone had ideas.
Nobody asked a different question:
"What happens after a candidate says yes to the first interview?"
Looking back, that was probably the real problem.
I notice something interesting whenever startups talk about hiring.
The conversation almost always begins with sourcing.
Where do we find talent?
Which platform works best?
Should we use remote hiring services?
Should we invest in global recruitment services?
Those are important questions.
But they're also the easiest questions.
The difficult part starts after someone enters the pipeline.
The invisible waiting room
Imagine walking into a restaurant.
A waiter greets you immediately.
You get a menu.
Then...nothing.
Ten minutes.
Twenty minutes.
Nobody says anything.
You don't know whether to wait or leave.
Hiring can feel exactly like that.
Candidates often don't reject companies because of salary.
They reject uncertainty.
Silence creates stories in people's minds.
"They're probably not interested."
"They must have found someone better."
"They're disorganized."
Maybe none of those things are true.
But people fill gaps with assumptions.
The best hiring process I ever saw was almost boring
I expected a sophisticated system.
Instead, I saw a whiteboard.
Every candidate had one rule:
No profile could stay untouched for more than 24 hours.
That's it.
No complicated recruitment automation.
No endless dashboards.
Just a simple commitment to momentum.
Ironically, that company hired faster than businesses with far bigger HR teams.
We're obsessed with optimization
As builders, we optimize everything.
Database queries.
Landing pages.
APIs.
Performance scores.
Then hiring arrives, and suddenly we're comfortable waiting six days to schedule a conversation.
It's strange when you think about it.
A developer would never intentionally add six seconds to a website load time.
Yet companies accidentally add six days to a hiring decision.
Maybe talent isn't the scarce resource anymore
Access to talent has improved dramatically.
Between technical recruitment services, talent acquisition services, and recruitment outsourcing services, companies can reach people they couldn't have found a decade ago.
The scarce resource might actually be attention.
Managers are busy.
Interviewers are busy.
Founders are busy.
Every delay compounds.
By the time everyone finally agrees, the candidate has often moved on.
Something a recruiter told me
I once asked a recruiter what separated companies that hired well from companies that constantly struggled.
I expected an answer about sourcing strategies.
Instead, they shrugged and said:
"The good ones reply."
That felt almost disappointingly simple.
But maybe simple is the point.
My takeaway
I still think recruitment services matter.
I still think better sourcing creates opportunities.
But opportunities have a short shelf life.
The companies that win aren't always the ones with the biggest pipelines.
They're the ones that create the least amount of waiting.
And if I had understood that meeting differently a couple of years ago, we probably wouldn't have lost three weeks chasing a problem that wasn't actually there.
Top comments (0)