DEV Community

Cover image for FW/1 vs ColdBox vs Mura: Which ColdFusion Framework Fits Your Team in 2025?
Deepak Sir
Deepak Sir

Posted on Originally published at Medium

FW/1 vs ColdBox vs Mura: Which ColdFusion Framework Fits Your Team in 2025?

These three aren’t the same kind of tool, and choosing well starts with knowing that. FW/1 (Framework One) and ColdBox are MVC application frameworks — you use them to build custom ColdFusion applications. Mura is a CMS (content management system) — you use it to run content-driven websites where non-developers edit pages, not to scaffold a bespoke app. So the real question isn’t “which framework,” it’s “am I building a custom application (FW/1 or ColdBox) or running a content site (a Mura-family CMS)?” Among the application frameworks: FW/1 is lightweight and minimalist — historically a single file, convention-over-configuration, with a tiny learning curve, ideal for small-to-medium apps and teams that want the framework to get out of the way. ColdBox is the full-featured HMVC platform — conventions-based, modular, with an ecosystem (WireBox DI, TestBox testing, CommandBox, LogBox, CacheBox), aggressive maintenance, and a conference (Into the Box) — ideal for larger, team-based, enterprise applications. Mura matters with a 2025 caveat: Mura CMS went closed-source/proprietary with v10 in 2020, and the open-source lineage now lives on as Masa CMS (a community fork of Mura 7.1). This guide compares all three by what they are, their strengths, and which fits your team.
Read More

Top comments (0)