Explore why Rust is fast gaining popularity in high-performance computing and how key tech giants are migrating away from C++ for good. We’ll discuss the reasons behind the transition, real-world adoption examples, strengths and limits of Rust, and whether it truly is the future of systems development.
Introduction: A Quiet Revolution in Systems Programming:
For decades, C++ has served as the backbone of modern computing infrastructure. From browsers and operating systems to embedded devices, databases, and high-frequency trading systems, its performance and adaptability have made it a popular among systems programmers.
However, this power came at a cost. Developers using C++ are continuously confronted with managing memory, avoiding unsafe concurrency, and traversing one of the steepest learning curves in programming. For years, the software industry accepted these trade-offs as necessary — until Rust came along.
Rust is not just another programming language. It represents a shift in how developers think about performance, security, and maintainability. Designed by Mozilla Research and first released in 2015, Rust offers memory safety without garbage collection, fearless concurrency, and a modern, tooling-rich developer experience.
In 2025, the industry is seeing a tipping point. From large tech corporations to startups and open-source communities, developers are transitioning to Rust not just as an alternative, but as the new standard.
Let’s start by knowing why Rust is generating headlines and winning brains in 2025.
1. Why Rust Is Taking Front Stage Quickly?
Rust’s rising appeal transcends mere hype. It solves fundamental problems that have plagued systems developers for decades. Here’s a closer look at the key reasons behind its rise.
1.1 Memory Safety Without a Garbage Collector
One of Rust’s main selling features is its assured memory safety at compile time, achieved by its unique ownership mechanism. This implies Rust can prevent issues like null pointer dereferencing, buffer overflows, and use-after-free mistakes — without relying on a garbage collector like Java or Go.
Here’s a simple example:
fn main() {
let s1 = String::from("hello");
let s2 = s1; // s1 is moved into s2
// println!("{}", s1); // This will throw a compile-time error
}
Rust maintains strong constraints about who owns data, making it difficult to unintentionally utilize memory that has previously been freed. This behavior results in safer programs without the runtime overhead of garbage collection.
By leaving it to the developer to manually allocate and remove memory, C++ often results in hard-to-find flaws and vulnerabilities.
Microsoft **claims that Rust directly tackles memory safety concerns, which account for seventy percent of their security fixes.
**Source: MSRC, the Microsoft Security Response Center
1.2 fearless concurrency
Rust allows concurrency not only theoretically but also by default is safe. In C++, maintaining multi-threaded systems can be problematic if developers aren’t cautious about race situations, locks, and thread safety.
Rust guarantees thread safety by means of compile-time checks and ownership mechanisms. For instance, unless specifically synchronized, it won’t let two threads access the same changeable data at once.
Here is a Rust thread example:
use std::thread;
fn main() {
let handle = thread::spawn(|| {
println!("Hello from a thread!");
});
handle.join().unwrap();
}
The compiler will enforce borrowing rules, therefore stopping data races. Usually a cause of uncertainty in C++ programming, this approach motivates developers to build concurrent programs with confidence.
1.3 Contemporary Developer Experience
Another reason Rust’s tooling has become fast a favorite among developers is its simplicity. Its compiler not only finds mistakes early but also provides plain language explanations.
- Rust’s package manager and build system streamlines dependency management, testing, and compiling.
- Lead by crates.io, the ecosystem is fast expanding with excellent, community-owned libraries.
- IDE integration allows the official language server, rust-analyzer, to smoothly coordinate the programming experience.
Especially for beginners, C++ boasts a fractured toolchain, inconsistent build systems (e.g., make, CMake, ninja), and inadequate error diagnostics.
1.4 supported by Big Tech:
Rust’s maturity and adoption are no longer speculative. Major organizations are incorporating Rust into crucial systems:
- Microsoft is experimenting using Rust in low-level Windows components.
- Google utilizes Rust to ship components of the Android OS.
- Amazon Web Services (AWS) developed Firecracker, their ultra-light microVM technology, entirely in Rust.
- Rust is now formally supported server-side language added by Meta, formerly Facebook.
These firms actively invest in Rust, not only test it.
2. C++’s Decline in High-Risk Contexts:
In several important areas—especially where security, dependability, and long-term maintainability are non-negotiable—C++ is rapidly losing ground while Rust is sprinting forward.
2.1 Security Events as Motivation
Memory safety problems are among the main sources of security flaws, as was already noted. Although C++ offers low-level control, it also makes it much too simple to introduce flaws that could cause system crashes, data leaks, or remote code execution.
Internal Microsoft research found that memory safety concerns accounted for over 70% of all critical vulnerabilities in their products; most of these resulted from C or C++ code.
Microsoft and other companies are giving memory-safe languages like Rust top priority for use in security-critical components given this concerning trend.
2.2 Growing Maintenance Cost:
Maintaining big C++ codebases is famously challenging. Technical debt increases in magnitude as projects grow, particularly in codebases spanning decades and through several iterations and ownership changes.
Maintaining C++ at scale runs a risk and a resource drain without consistent formatting, modern language features, and safe concurrency primitives.
Particularly for new teams inheriting legacy systems, Rust’s expressive syntax, rigorous compile-time checks, and community standards help to lower long-term maintenance costs and increase team productivity.
2.3 Challenges New Developer Onboarding:
Modern developers—especially those from languages like Python, JavaScript, or Go—often find C++ antiquated, difficult, and hostile to newbies. The syntax is difficult, the error messages are vague, and even writing basic, safe programs can call for thorough understanding of memory management.
Rust, while stringent, offers a substantially more supportive developer environment. It actively guides new programmers toward writing safe, idiomatic code.
This difference has real-world implications: companies looking to scale their engineering teams find it easier to train developers in Rust than C++.
3. Real-World Adoption: What the Industry Is Doing:
The shift toward Rust isn’t limited to language enthusiasts or startups. Over the past few years, large-scale adoption by tech giants has validated Rust as an industry-grade language.
3.1 Microsoft:
After realizing how many of its vulnerabilities connected to C/C++ code, Microsoft started looking at Rust for systems programming. Components in Rust have been actively prototyped by the Windows and Azure teams, and they have found application in portions of the Windows kernel, Device Driver Framework, and Azure Confidential Computing.
Source: Microsoft Security Blog
3.2 Google:
Google officially adopted Rust for Android’s low-level system components in 2021. The Android Open Source Project (AOSP) now includes production modules written in Rust, aimed at eliminating memory safety bugs from native code.
3.3 Amazon Web Services (AWS):
AWS has been one of the earliest large-scale adopters of Rust. Firecracker, the microVM behind AWS Lambda and Fargate, was written entirely in Rust. AWS cites performance, security, and resource efficiency as key reasons for choosing Rust over C++.
Source: AWS Open Source Blog
3.4 Meta (Facebook):
Meta added Rust as an officially supported server-side language alongside C++ and Python. Their engineering teams are encouraged to use Rust for backend services that require high performance with strong safety guarantees.
3.5 The Linux Kernel:
Perhaps the most symbolic endorsement of Rust is its inclusion in the Linux kernel. Since 2022, Rust has been accepted as a second official language for writing kernel modules. This marks a historic shift — for decades, the Linux kernel was written entirely in C.
4. Where Rust Wins — and Where It Still Lags:
While Rust has clear strengths, it’s important to acknowledge its limitations too. Not every project should be redone in Rust — and not every team is ready for it.
Where Rust Excels:
- Systems Programming: Operating systems, compilers, device drivers, embedded firmware
- WebAssembly: Secure browser execution and sandboxed apps
- CLI Tools: DevOps utilities, automation tools, package managers (e.g., ripgrep, exa, fd)
- Cloud Infrastructure: Microservices, networking, and container runtimes
These domains benefit greatly from Rust’s performance, safety, and concurrency guarantees.
Where Rust Falls Short:
- GUI Development: While efforts like egui, iced, and druid exist, Rust lacks a mature, cross-platform GUI framework equivalent to Qt or Electron.
- Mobile Apps: Rust doesn’t yet offer first-class support for iOS/Android app development out of the box.
- Rapid Prototyping: The compiler’s strictness might slow down fast iteration, especially for scripting-style workflows.
- Legacy Integration: Migrating a mature C++ codebase to Rust is costly and complicated, frequently requiring dual-language interop via FFI.
5. Rust vs. C++: A Quick Comparison:
To make this shift more tangible, here’s a comparison table highlighting key differences between Rust and C++:
6. Is Rust Ready to Replace C++ Everywhere?
The short answer is: Not everywhere — but in many places, yes.
Rust isn’t aiming to completely eradicate C++. Instead, it’s positioning itself as the safe default for new systems-level projects. It’s increasingly being used to create new components that demand high stability, while interoperating with old C++ codebases.
When Rust Makes Sense:
- New projects where safety and concurrency are major objectives
- Teams building security-sensitive applications
- Startups or companies without huge C++ legacy systems
- Open-source contributors who prefer clean, modern tooling
When C++ Still Counts:
- Big legacy systems featuring millions of C++ lines
- Projects needing sophisticated GUI libraries
- Teams with extensive C++ experience and existing CI/CD pipelines
- Certain game development procedures connected to C++ engines
7. The Future: Rust as the Default for Safe Systems Code:
Rust’s rapid growth isn’t an accident — it’s a reflection of a broader industry shift toward secure-by-default programming. As cloud infrastructure, IoT devices, and embedded systems proliferate internationally, memory safety and low-level control are no longer trade-offs — they are needs.
In 2025 and beyond, Rust will likely become:
- The default language for building secure infrastructure tools
- A key element in clouds-native development stacks
- Standard teaching language for university systems programming
- a first choice for open-source projects aiming at dependability and performance
Conclusion: A Paradigm Shift in Software Engineering:
Rust’s momentum no longer comes from theory. Supported by big tech companies, inclusion into main system software, and a vibrant, expanding community, Rust is firmly positioned as a substantial alternative — and sometimes a better one — than C++.
Although C++ is still a necessary component of most worldwide software systems, it is aging. Signs of a language meant for another age are the maintenance load, the lack of safety assurances, and the onboarding challenge.
Rust is becoming the present instead of only the future of systems programming.
Further Reading & References:
MSRC on Memory Safety Issues
Blog Post about AWS Firecrackers
Top comments (0)