Software development has always lived at the extremes.
In the early days, we planned everything. Specifications were sacred. Architecture diagrams came before a single line of code. Change was slow, expensive, and wrapped in layers of documentation. Shipping software felt like steering a cargo ship.
Then Agile arrived, and the pendulum swung hard in the opposite direction.
We optimized for speed. Iteration replaced perfection. “Working software over comprehensive documentation” became the rallying cry. We shipped early, shipped often, and accepted that refinement would come later. And to be fair—this worked. Productivity exploded. Culture changed. Software moved faster than ever before.
Today, we’re entering another shift.
AI tools can now generate production-ready code from a sentence. Frontend components, API layers, schemas, tests—often in seconds. Coding itself is no longer the bottleneck.
And once again, the pendulum is swinging.
Not back to waterfall. Not back to bureaucratic specs. But toward something more deliberate: intentional system design, optimized not just for humans, but for machines that write code on our behalf.
When speed stops being the advantage
AI has fundamentally changed what “being productive” looks like.
You can prompt your way to a working feature faster than ever. And for prototypes, experiments, and MVPs, that’s a gift. But speed without structure ages badly. Code written at the speed of thought tends to decay at the speed of neglect.
What happens next is predictable:
Architecture decisions are made implicitly by the model.
Patterns get copied without context.
Complexity compounds faster than understanding.
The result isn’t innovation—it’s accelerated technical debt.
The problem isn’t that we’re moving too fast. It’s that we’re letting the machine decide the direction.
Vibe coding and the illusion of effortlessness
“Just vibe it.”
That phrase has become shorthand for a new style of development: describe what you want, let the AI do the work, tweak the result, ship. It feels magical. For many developers—especially newer ones—it’s the default workflow.
This is vibe coding.
Used responsibly, it’s a superpower. Used carelessly, it’s a liability.
Vibe coding optimizes for short-term output, not long-term coherence. It encourages shallow understanding. Decisions aren’t recorded; they’re implied. And once those implied decisions spread across a codebase, nobody—human or machine—fully understands the system anymore.
The answer isn’t to reject AI. It’s to reassign control.
We don’t need more people prompting functions.
We need people designing the systems those prompts operate within.
Designing frameworks instead of functions
The tactical layer of development is being automated in real time.
Writing a function, a resolver, or a UI component is no longer the scarce skill. AI can do that cheaply and quickly. What it can’t do reliably is design a coherent system.
That’s where human value is concentrating.
Modern developers aren’t just builders anymore—they’re architects in the literal sense. Not title-inflated enterprise architects, but practitioners who design boundaries, contracts, and constraints that shape how software is produced.
The shift looks like this:
Instead of “How do I implement this endpoint?”, ask “What’s the cleanest contract for this responsibility?”
Instead of “How do I fix this bug?”, ask “How do I prevent this entire class of bugs through structure?”
Instead of refactoring endlessly, build constraints that stop bad patterns from appearing in the first place.
The most valuable developers aren’t writing the most code.
They’re designing the environments where good code is inevitable.
A new audience for our code
For decades, we wrote clean code and documentation for the next developer.
Now, the next developer is often an AI.
That changes everything.
AI doesn’t reason the way humans do. It doesn’t ask clarifying questions. It pattern-matches aggressively and reproduces what it sees. Your codebase isn’t just a product anymore—it’s training data.
That means:
Predictable patterns matter more than clever abstractions.
Tight constraints prevent the model from wandering into unsafe territory.
Curated examples shape future outputs.
Clear naming and structure reduce ambiguity across files and modules.
Every well-designed type, every enforced boundary, every intentional example becomes a breadcrumb the model will follow when generating the next thousand lines of code.
This isn’t just good hygiene anymore.
It’s a core driver of velocity.
Rethinking Agile for the AI era
Agile transformed software development—and its core values still matter. But some principles need reinterpretation in a world where machines write much of the code.
“Working software over comprehensive documentation” made sense when documentation slowed humans down.
Now, undocumented systems slow machines down.
In this new context:
We may value comprehensive structure over merely working software, because software that works today but collapses tomorrow is a liability.
We may value curated systems over individuals and interactions, because many “individuals” in the loop are now machines.
We may value stability and repeatability over constant change, because constraints enable faster iteration than chaos ever could.
This isn’t bureaucracy. It’s a new kind of agility—one built on strong architectural bones and machine-readable intent.
In 2005, the bottleneck was speed.
In 2025, the bottleneck is direction.
Agile got us moving.
Now we need a map.
What senior developers and tech leads should focus on
If you’re experienced in this industry, your role is already shifting—whether your title reflects it or not.
- Think in systems, not snippets
Ask which decisions should be made once and encoded permanently. Weak structure collapses faster than ever in AI-accelerated codebases.
- Build guardrails, not just features
Types, schemas, linters, tests, and CI pipelines don’t just enforce correctness—they communicate intent to both humans and machines.
- Curate examples like a librarian
Your repository is a learning environment. Remove contradictions. Highlight good patterns. Bad examples replicate just as fast as good ones.
- Own the review layer
AI can generate functional code. It can’t make thoughtful tradeoffs. Review for coherence, not just correctness.
- Stop being the “genius developer”
The smartest person in the room isn’t solving the most problems—they’re preventing problems from appearing at all.
Leadership now means encoding judgment into systems, not keeping it locked in your head
Top comments (0)