Real-time media systems behave very differently from traditional web or signaling workloads. While SIP signaling can be scaled horizontally with relative ease, RTP media transport exposes limitations in operating systems, networking stacks, and application architectures. At high concurrency, these limitations manifest as CPU saturation, jitter, and audio degradation long before network bandwidth is exhausted.
This document outlines the architectural principles required to design RTP media infrastructure capable of sustaining tens of thousands of concurrent calls. It focuses on packet-rate constraints, kernel-level optimizations, and system separation strategies that enable predictable performance at carrier scale.
Why Media Transport Fails Before Bandwidth Is Consumed
When engineers estimate capacity for real-time voice systems, throughput is often used as the primary sizing metric. For RTP, this approach is misleading.
Using G.711 as a baseline:
Each call generates two unidirectional RTP streams
Each stream sends packets every 20 milliseconds
Each packet is small but frequent
At 30,000 concurrent calls, this results in millions of packets per second traversing the network stack. Even with abundant link capacity, the operating system must process each packet individually. The cumulative cost of interrupts, routing decisions, and memory copies becomes the limiting factor.
In high-density RTP systems, packet rate, not bandwidth, defines the scalability ceiling.
Operating System Constraints in High-PPS Environments
General-purpose operating systems are optimized for balanced workloads, not sustained multi-million packet-per-second processing. In standard network paths, each packet requires multiple transitions between hardware, kernel space, and user space.
At scale, these transitions dominate CPU utilization. The system becomes interrupt-bound, causing latency spikes and dropped packets even though overall throughput remains well below network capacity.
Traditional tuning techniques such as increasing socket buffers or adjusting IRQ affinity offer marginal improvements but do not address the fundamental architectural mismatch.
Kernel-Level Media Forwarding as a Design Requirement
To move beyond these constraints, RTP packet handling must be simplified and accelerated. The most effective approach is to forward media traffic at the kernel level while keeping control-plane logic in user space.
*This design pattern minimizes:
*
- Context switching
- Memory copying
- User-space packet inspection
RTPEngine exemplifies this model by installing RTP forwarding rules directly into the kernel. Once a call is established, packets are routed according to preconfigured rules without application-level involvement. This allows systems to sustain high packet rates with predictable CPU usage.
*Stateless Media Clusters for Horizontal Scale
*
Large-scale RTP deployments rely on multiple media nodes operating in parallel. These nodes are intentionally stateless, handling only active media flows.
*Key characteristics of scalable RTP media clusters include:
*
Externalized call state management
Load distribution handled by SIP proxies
No dependency on shared storage
Fast node replacement and traffic redistribution
This approach simplifies scaling and failure recovery while ensuring consistent performance across the cluster.
*Separating Media Transport from Call Processing
*
Media transport and call logic serve fundamentally different purposes and should not be combined.
PBX platforms are designed to interpret and manipulate audio streams. This includes decoding, transcoding, mixing, and analysis. These operations are computationally expensive and do not scale efficiently when applied indiscriminately to all calls.
In contrast, media proxies focus solely on packet forwarding and encryption, avoiding audio processing entirely. By limiting PBX involvement to calls that require business logic, overall system density increases dramatically.
*Layered Architecture for Large-Scale Voice Systems
*
A scalable RTP platform typically consists of multiple functional layers:
- Signaling Layer
- Handles SIP routing and policy
- Remains stateless and horizontally scalable
- Media Transport Layer
- Forwards RTP and SRTP packets
- Optimized for high PPS
- Does not interpret audio content
- Media Processing Layer
Performs IVR, conferencing, recording, and transcoding
Scales independently based on feature demand
This separation ensures that heavy media traffic does not degrade call control or application logic.
Transcoding and Its Impact on System Capacity
Transcoding is one of the most expensive operations in voice systems. It requires decoding compressed audio, converting sample formats, and re-encoding into a different codec. At high concurrency, this significantly reduces call density per server.
*To mitigate this impact:
*
Allow endpoints to negotiate compatible codecs directly
Prefer passthrough for commonly supported codecs
Isolate transcoding into dedicated service pools
This strategy preserves capacity for the majority of calls while maintaining flexibility for incompatible endpoints.
Codec Selection for High-Density Media Transport
Codec choice directly affects CPU utilization and scalability.
G.711 provides excellent quality with minimal processing overhead and is ideal when bandwidth is available.
Opus offers superior compression but introduces moderate CPU cost.
Low-bitrate codecs reduce bandwidth usage but often increase processing complexity and licensing overhead.
In large-scale environments, operational simplicity and processing efficiency generally outweigh bandwidth savings.
Infrastructure Considerations for Media Workloads
Media servers must be selected based on network performance characteristics rather than raw compute metrics.
Key requirements include:
High packet processing capacity
Low and consistent latency
Support for advanced NIC features such as SR-IOV
Stable CPU performance under sustained load
Network-optimized cloud instances are typically required, while burstable or general-purpose instances are unsuitable for sustained RTP traffic.
Conclusion
Building RTP infrastructure at massive scale requires careful alignment between software architecture and underlying system behavior. Packet rate, CPU efficiency, and separation of responsibilities are the primary determinants of success.
By forwarding media at the kernel level, isolating processing-heavy operations, and designing stateless, layered systems, it is possible to support tens of thousands of concurrent RTP streams reliably and cost-effectively.
Source Reference
https://www.ecosmob.com/rtp-scaling-architecture-concurrent-media-streams/
Top comments (0)