DEV Community

Esha Suchana
Esha Suchana

Posted on

The Real QA Automation Struggles (and How to Finally Get Ahead)

Automation promised to revolutionize QA. Faster releases, fewer bugs, less grunt work. But reality hits different.

Most QA teams still spend hours maintaining brittle scripts, chasing flaky test results, and fighting toolchains that don’t talk to each other. The promise of efficiency is often drowned out by bloated processes and tech debt.

So where’s the disconnect? And how can modern teams move forward—without burning out?

Let’s break down the 7 most common automation pain points teams face today—and how smarter, more autonomous tools like Aurick can help turn things around.


1. The Setup Slog: Cost, Time, Chaos

Setting up a proper automation pipeline takes serious effort. Frameworks, infrastructure, environments—it’s not plug and play.

Even with free tools like Selenium or Playwright, time is money. And most teams don’t have spare bandwidth to build, scale, and maintain everything from scratch.

According to Capgemini Research, manual testing typically achieves only 20–30% test coverage, while autonomous tools routinely hit 90%+—but getting there requires upfront investment.

Where Aurick fits in: With minimal setup and intelligent defaults, teams can skip the complex boilerplate. Aurick runs out of the box—no massive infrastructure needed—and integrates with your existing workflows.


2. Brittle Scripts, Broken Trust

You automate a test. A week later, a tiny UI tweak breaks it. You spend an hour fixing it. Rinse and repeat.

Test fragility isn’t just annoying—it erodes trust in your entire pipeline. And the more coverage you add, the more brittle everything feels.

Aurick handles this differently. It uses self-healing strategies—automatically adjusting to changes in the UI. When elements shift, the tests adapt. So you don’t need to babysit your suite after every frontend release.


3. Skill Gaps That Slow the Whole Team

Let’s be real: not every QA engineer writes production-grade code. And that’s fine—testing is a mindset, not just syntax.

But most automation frameworks demand technical fluency. Which sidelines non-technical testers and bottlenecks collaboration between QA, devs, and product teams.

Aurick bridges that gap with intuitive, no-code workflows that let anyone explore, test, and validate product flows—without needing to touch a line of JavaScript or Python. You still get deep control if you want it—but you don’t need it to get started.


4. Test Data Headaches

Testing on real data? Dangerous. Testing on fake data? Often useless. Managing test data is a constant battle—especially when your environments aren’t synced or isolated.

Aurick automates data handling, so each test run gets a clean, controlled environment. That means fewer false positives, no rogue variables, and full confidence that what works in staging will work in prod.


5. CI/CD Chaos

Automation means nothing if it’s not part of the pipeline.

But integrating QA into CI/CD is harder than it sounds—especially when tests aren’t reliable, or when tools don’t play well with GitHub Actions, Jenkins, or other devops stacks.

Aurick was built to be pipeline-first. Push a branch → tests run → results come back clean, contextual, and easy to triage. It doesn’t just “fit into CI”—it thrives in it.


6. Maintenance Burnout

The more you automate, the more you maintain. And soon, your QA team isn’t testing new features—they’re patching flaky tests from last sprint.

Flaky tests don’t just waste time. They erode confidence. They slow releases. They make teams question whether automation is even worth it.

Aurick tackles this head-on with auto-retries, smart locators, and a modular design that keeps maintenance effort insanely low. And when failures do happen, it gives you full visibility into why—no black boxes, no mystery.


7. The AI Shift is Already Happening

This one’s not a challenge—it’s a wake-up call.

AI is fundamentally changing how QA works. We’re already seeing tools that generate test cases, optimize coverage, and auto-analyze bugs. But not all AI is created equal.

Aurick takes a different approach: it behaves like a real QA would—exploring your product live, discovering flows, generating real test cases, and logging everything it sees. It doesn’t guess. It observes.

According to NVIDIA, 75% of enterprises are exploring AI-driven testing workflows to improve reliability and reduce manual overhead. The future isn’t manual—and it’s arriving fast.


Final Thoughts: QA Deserves Better

QA automation shouldn’t be a second job. You shouldn’t need a PhD in frameworks or dedicate half your sprint to debugging test scripts.

Aurick is for teams who want the benefits of automation—without the usual baggage. It's not just a tool. It’s a teammate that explores, tests, logs, and learns—just like a human would, but faster, more reliably, and at scale.

If you're ready to stop wrestling with QA and start shipping with confidence, it might be time to try something smarter.

👉 Join the Aurick waitlist and be one of the first to experience AI-driven, fully autonomous QA.

Top comments (0)