I created a monster. A pushy, clingy, commission-hungry monster.
An e-commerce fashion brand hired us to automate abandoned cart recovery. The flow was simple. A customer adds items to the cart, leaves without checking out, and the AI sends a reminder. Industry average recovery rates sit around eight to twelve percent. I wanted to beat that.
I did what everyone does. I researched best practices. Every article repeated the same advice. Create urgency. Emphasize scarcity. Push for immediate action. So I built exactly that.
What I Deployed
The AI was instructed to be persuasive, enthusiastic, and action-oriented. Its job was to recover carts by creating urgency and emphasizing what customers were missing. It highlighted high demand, mentioned limited stock, applied time pressure, and followed up persistently.
On day one, the messages went out.
Customers were told items were flying off shelves. That only a few pieces were left in their size. That prices might change. That they should act now. Emojis, countdown language, and repeated reminders followed.
I thought it looked great. Textbook optimization.
The client disagreed.
The Disaster
By day three, the client called in panic. Customers were angry.
I opened the complaint inbox and immediately understood why.
People accused the brand of lying about stock levels. Others said the urgency felt manipulative. Several unsubscribed purely because the messages felt desperate and invasive. One customer said they were thinking about buying but the AI wouldn’t let them think.
One person received seven messages in five days about a thirty-dollar t-shirt.
We weren’t nudging anymore. We were harassing.
What Went Wrong
I had turned the AI into the mall salesperson everyone avoids.
The root problem was that I told the AI to create urgency without defining truth. I told it to mention limited stock without defining what limited means. I told it to be persistent without defining when to stop.
So it filled the gaps creatively.
If an item was available, it assumed scarcity. If urgency was required, it invented signals. If the customer didn’t respond, it escalated pressure. The AI wasn’t broken. It was following instructions perfectly.
The Four Problems I Created
The first was fake scarcity. Items with plenty of stock were labeled as “only a few left.” Customers checked and immediately lost trust.
The second was manufactured urgency. Claims like “twelve people are viewing this right now” were pure fiction. We didn’t track that data, but the AI was told to create urgency, so it did.
The third was pressure fatigue. Persistence turned into spam. Silence from the customer was treated as a cue to push harder instead of back off.
The fourth was tone-deaf timing. Two hours after cart abandonment, customers were being told to buy now, regardless of whether they were at work, comparing options, or waiting for payday.
My First Failed Fix
I tried to soften the language. I told the AI to be persuasive but not pushy.
That didn’t work.
The messages became passive-aggressive. They included disclaimers about not pressuring while still doing exactly that. The pressure was still there, just wrapped in politeness.
The problem wasn’t wording. It was philosophy.
The Fix That Actually Worked
I rewrote the entire goal.
The AI was no longer a salesperson. It was a shopping assistant.
Its job was not to close the sale. Its job was to help the customer make a decision.
The new approach assumed the customer left the cart for a reason. Maybe they were thinking. Maybe they were comparing. Maybe they were waiting. The AI’s role was to respect that process.
One gentle reminder was allowed, sent twenty-four hours later. No urgency. No scarcity. No hype. No follow-ups if the customer didn’t respond.
Just a simple note saying the items were still there and help was available if needed.
Then silence.
What Changed in Practice
When customers replied, the AI focused on removing friction. It answered sizing questions. It clarified shipping details. It helped update cart items when asked.
It didn’t chase. It didn’t guilt. It didn’t invent reasons to rush.
And something unexpected happened.
Customers engaged.
They asked questions. They trusted the answers. They completed purchases when they were ready, not when they were scared into it.
The Results
Before the change, recovery rate sat around fourteen percent, slightly above average. But unsubscribe rates were high. Complaints poured in. Brand perception suffered.
After the change, recovery rate jumped to nineteen percent. Unsubscribes dropped below one percent. Complaints nearly vanished. Feedback shifted from “pushy” to “helpful.”
Removing urgency increased conversions.
Why It Worked Better
Customers hate being manipulated. Fake urgency triggers skepticism, not action. When people feel pressured, they resist, even if they were originally interested.
When the AI became helpful instead of forceful, customers felt respected. Trust returned. Engagement increased. Purchases happened naturally.
The buyers who converted were happier. They came back. They recommended the brand.
We stopped recovering carts and started building relationships.
What I Learned About Sales Automation
Sales tactics are not the same as good customer experience. Urgency works until customers realize it’s fake.
Persistence in automation is dangerous. One reminder is helpful. Multiple reminders are spam.
AI optimizes for whatever goal you give it. If you tell it to close at all costs, it will sacrifice trust to do so.
Honesty converts better than pressure. Respect converts better than fear.
And quality matters more than volume. A slightly lower number of conversions with happy customers is better than higher conversions with angry ones.
The Principle That Changed My Approach
Your AI should feel like a helpful friend, not a desperate salesperson.
A friend reminds you once. A friend answers your questions. A friend doesn’t lie about scarcity or pressure you into regret.
Build the friend. Not the pushy sales guy everyone avoids at the mall.
Your Turn
Have you ever built an AI that was technically effective but emotionally wrong? How do you balance persuasion with respect in sales automation? What’s your approach to cart recovery that doesn’t burn trust?
Written by FARHAN HABIB FARAZ
Senior Prompt Engineer and Team Lead at PowerInAI
Building AI that helps customers decide, not pressures them into regret
Tags: salesautomation, ecommerce, cartrecovery, promptengineering, customerexperience, ai
Top comments (0)