What is a Modular Monolith?
A modular monolith is a single deployable application whose internal structure is divided into independent modules, each representing a specific business domain or bounded context.
Unlike a traditional monolith, where code from different areas is intertwined, a modular monolith clearly separates domains and enforces boundaries through explicit contracts and dependency rules.
Each module encapsulates its own business rules and data access, following the principles of high cohesion and low coupling. The result is a system that behaves like a monolith operationally but maintains many of the structural advantages of a microservice architecture.
Why Modular Monoliths Matter
The modular monolith pattern addresses common pain points of large codebases:
Isolation: Changes in one domain do not ripple across unrelated parts of the system.
Clarity: Code is organized around business capabilities, not technical layers.
Maintainability: Each module can evolve with minimal impact on others.
Performance: Modules communicate in-process, eliminating the latency and complexity of network calls.
Operational simplicity: One deployable artifact means simpler CI/CD, monitoring, and rollback strategies.
Rather than adding network boundaries too early, a modular monolith keeps the architecture clean and cohesive while avoiding premature distribution.
Core Principles of a Modular Monolith
A successful modular monolith typically follows a few key architectural guidelines:
- Clear Domain Boundaries
Each module represents a bounded context. It contains everything related to that business area: entities, use cases, repositories, and interfaces.
- Dependency Direction
Modules do not depend on each other directly. If interaction is necessary, they communicate through well-defined interfaces registered in a composition root or dependency injection container.
- Encapsulation
Internal details of a module are private. Only public contracts are exposed to the rest of the system.
- Independent Testing
Each module can be tested in isolation, both at the domain and application level.
- Controlled Growth
If a module grows large enough, it can later be extracted as a standalone service with minimal friction.
Example: Structuring a Modular Monolith in .NET
A practical organization might look like this:
/src
├── Modules
│ ├── Patients
│ │ ├── Domain
│ │ ├── Application
│ │ ├── Infrastructure
│ │ └── PatientsModule.cs
│ ├── Professionals
│ │ ├── Domain
│ │ ├── Application
│ │ ├── Infrastructure
│ │ └── ProfessionalsModule.cs
│ └── Identity
│ ├── Domain
│ ├── Application
│ ├── Infrastructure
│ └── IdentityModule.cs
└── WebApi
├── Program.cs
└── CompositionRoot.cs
This layout allows each domain to remain internally consistent while still part of a single deployable system. The Web API acts as the entry point, wiring dependencies and exposing endpoints.
Communication Between Modules
In a modular monolith, modules depend on contracts, not implementations.
For example, the Patients module might need to query information from the Professionals module:
public interface IProfessionalService
{
Task ExistsAsync(Guid professionalId);
}
The implementation of IProfessionalService resides in the Professionals module and is registered in the application’s dependency injection container.
This keeps both modules loosely coupled and independent of one another.
When to Choose a Modular Monolith
A modular monolith is a strong fit when:
Your product is in early or medium growth stages.
Your team is small to medium-sized.
You want fast delivery cycles without distributed system complexity.
You plan to evolve toward microservices only when truly necessary.
Many successful systems started as modular monoliths before extracting specific modules — authentication, payments, notifications — into independent services once scale demanded it.
Advantages at a Glance
Aspect Modular Monolith Microservices
Deployment Single unit Multiple independent services
Communication In-process (fast) Over network (complex)
Complexity Lower High operational overhead
Modularity Strong internal boundaries Distributed boundaries
Scaling Vertical or selective extraction Horizontal per service
Team requirements Moderate High maturity and coordination
Conclusion
A modular monolith is not a step backward from microservices; it is a disciplined, evolutionary architecture that emphasizes clarity, modularity, and maintainability.
By keeping boundaries explicit and dependencies under control, it enables teams to build software that scales in both complexity and performance — without unnecessary operational overhead.
Good architecture is not defined by how many services you deploy, but by how clearly your system expresses its domains and how easily it can evolve.
The modular monolith strikes that balance perfectly.
Top comments (0)