At their core, both approaches want to help us understand uncertainty and make decisions based on data. But they go about it in fundamentally different ways.
Both want to answer the question, "What does probability mean, and how do we use data to make inferences?"
Keep in mind these central questions:
- "What does probability represent?" Bayesians and Frequentists answer this differently.
- "How do we update our knowledge with new data?" This is where the approaches diverge most clearly.
Frequentist Statistics: The Long-Run Frequency Approach
Frequentist statistics is the traditional approach you'll encounter in most introductory statistics courses.
What Probability Means to Frequentists
To a Frequentist, probability is about long-run frequency. If you flip a coin infinitely many times, the proportion of heads approaches 0.5. That's probability ie what happens in the long run if you repeat an experiment over and over.
Core Principle
Frequentists treat parameters as fixed but unknown. For example, a population mean exists as one true value. We just don't know it. The job is to use sample data to estimate it.
How They Work with Data
- No prior beliefs: Frequentists don't incorporate prior knowledge or beliefs into their analysis. The data speaks for itself.
- P-values and confidence intervals: These are core in Frequentist inference. A 95% confidence interval means "if we repeated this sampling process infinitely, 95% of such intervals would contain the true parameter."
- Hypothesis testing: You set up a null hypothesis and calculate the probability of seeing your data (or more extreme data) if the null is true. That's your p-value.
What Frequentists CANNOT Say
Here's the tricky part: Frequentists cannot make probability statements about parameters. They can't say "there's a 95% probability the true mean is between 10 and 20." Why? Because to them, the parameter is fixed ie it either is or isn't in that interval. The randomness is in the sampling process, not the parameter.
Bayesian Statistics: The Belief Update Approach
What Probability Means to Bayesians
To a Bayesian, probability represents degree of belief or uncertainty. It's subjective and personal. Probability quantifies what we believe about something, given all available information.
Core Principle
Bayesians treat parameters as random variables with probability distributions. There's no single "true" value we're trying to estimate instead, we describe our uncertainty about the parameter with a distribution.
How bayesians Work with Data
- Prior beliefs: Bayesians start with a prior distribution that represents what they believe before seeing the data. This could be based on previous studies, expert opinion, or even complete ignorance.
- Likelihood: This is the probability of observing the data given different parameter values (both approaches use this).
- Posterior distribution: Using Bayes' Theorem, they combine the prior and likelihood to get a posterior distribution—what they believe after seeing the data.
The fundamental equation:
Posterior is directly proportional to Prior x Likelihood
What Bayesians CAN Say
Bayesians can make probability statements about parameters! They can say "there's a 95% probability the true mean is between 10 and 20" because they treat the parameter as having a probability distribution.
refer back to what frequentists cannot say
The Key Differences at a Glance
1. Interpretation of Probability
- Frequentist: Long-run frequency (objective)
- Bayesian: Degree of belief (subjective)
2. Treatment of Parameters
- Frequentist: Fixed but unknown values
- Bayesian: Random variables with distributions
3. Use of Prior Information
- Frequentist: Not incorporated (only data matters)
- Bayesian: Explicitly incorporated through prior distributions
4. Type of Results
- Frequentist: Point estimates, confidence intervals, p-values
- Bayesian: Probability distributions (posterior distributions), credible intervals
5. Interpretation of Intervals
- Frequentist: "95% of such intervals would contain the true parameter if we repeated sampling infinitely"
- Bayesian: "There's a 95% probability the parameter lies in this interval"
6. Flexibility
- Frequentist: Simpler for standard problems, well-established methods
- Bayesian: More flexible for complex models, but computationally intensive
A Practical Example: Coin Flipping
Imagine you flip a coin 10 times and get 7 heads. You want to know if the coin is fair.
Frequentist Approach:
- Null hypothesis: The coin is fair (p = 0.5)
- Calculate: What's the probability of getting 7 or more heads if the coin is actually fair?
- P-value = 0.34 (not unusual)
- Conclusion: "We fail to reject the null hypothesis. The data is consistent with a fair coin."
- Note: They cannot say "there's a 34% chance the coin is fair"
Bayesian Approach:
- Prior: Maybe you believe the coin is probably fair, but you're open to it being biased
- Likelihood: The probability of 7 heads in 10 flips for different values of p
- Posterior: Combine prior and likelihood using Bayes' Theorem
- Conclusion: "Given the data and my prior beliefs, I now believe there's an 85% probability that p is between 0.45 and 0.85"
- They can make probability statements about the parameter
Note that most of "basic" statistics we do, we use frequentists approaches. By basic I mean this is the one mostly used in introductory statistics courses and right to do so as this is the traditional approach and has been the dominant paradigm.
Strengths and weaknesses.
Frequentist Strengths
- Objective doesn't depend on subjective priors
- Well-established with clear procedures
- Computationally simpler for many problems
- Widely accepted in scientific publications
Frequentist weaknesses
- Confidence intervals are often misinterpreted as Bayesian credible intervals
- P-values are frequently misused and misunderstood
- Ignores prior knowledge that might be valuable
- Long-run frequency interpretation can be unintuitive
Bayesian Strengths
- Intuitive interpretation (directly answers "what do we believe?")
- Naturally incorporates prior information
- Excellent for complex models and hierarchical structures
- Provides full probability distributions, not just point estimates
- Updates naturally as new data arrives
Bayesian weaknesses
- Results depend on choice of prior (though this can also be a strength)
- Computationally intensive (requires specialized software and techniques)
- Less standardized ie many choices to make
- "Subjective" nature makes some scientists uncomfortable
When to Use Which?
Use Frequentist methods when:
- You want objective, widely-accepted standard procedures
- You have no reliable prior information
- You're working with simple, standard statistical tests
- You need computational efficiency
- You're publishing in fields that require Frequentist approaches
Use Bayesian methods when:
- You have valuable prior information to incorporate
- You want intuitive probability statements about parameters
- You're working with complex hierarchical models
- You want to update beliefs as new data arrives
- You need to make decisions under uncertainty
The Bottom Line
The difference between Bayesian and Frequentist statistics boils down to fundamentally different answers to "What is probability?"
- Frequentists say: "Probability is long-run frequency. Parameters are fixed. Data is random."
- Bayesians say: "Probability is degree of belief. Parameters are uncertain. Everything has a distribution."
Neither is inherently "better" as they are different tools for different situations
The important thing is understanding what each approach assumes and what it can (and cannot) tell you. That way, you can interpret results correctly and choose the right tool for your problem.
Hope you've understood dear reader and leave a comment if you have any concern.
Top comments (0)