DEV Community

Harry Floyd
Harry Floyd

Posted on • Originally published at telegra.ph

The Indium Phosphide Bottleneck: What the Market Missed

A UK semiconductor company lost a quarter of its value in a single day this week. The market assumed Huawei exposure was catastrophic. The Huawei exposure is under five percent of revenue.

The panic was about the wrong thing.

Where Indium Phosphide Fits in the AI Stack

Every 1.6T optical transceiver shipping into an AI cluster relies on lasers made from indium phosphide (InP). Silicon cannot lase. InP does.

The supply chain:

Raw indium (zinc byproduct)
  → InP boule → sliced into substrates (AXT Inc)
    → Epitaxial wafer growth (IQE)
      → Laser fabrication (Lumentum, Coherent, MACOM)
        → Transceiver assembly
          → AI GPU clusters
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

IQE sits at the third step. It is the only independent large-scale epiwafer foundry with qualified InP capacity globally.

Why Switching Is Hard

Qualifying a new epiwafer supplier takes 12-24 months. Sample testing, device fabrication trials, reliability qualification. Once qualified, switching costs are enormous. There are approximately five qualified InP epiwafer suppliers worldwide. IQE is the only independent one at scale.

The MACOM Signal

In April 2026, MACOM invested £81M into IQE at 19.8p per share. MACOM received 11.5% ownership and two board seats, plus a long-term strategic supply agreement. The message: they cannot secure InP capacity without IQE.

Why Silicon Photonics Does Not Kill This

The common objection: silicon photonics will replace InP. This misunderstands the technology. Even silicon photonic ICs need InP lasers, integrated heterogeneously. Monolithic lasers-on-silicon are not expected before 2030. InP is needed regardless of which platform wins.

The Tension

IQE is not a clean story. Gross margins were under 4% last year on £118M revenue because reactors run at roughly half capacity. The wireless segment (57% of revenue) is declining. Three CEOs in five years. The current CEO also serves as CFO.

But the underlying structural thesis is clean: the InP bottleneck is real and tightening. AXT Inc is doubling capacity for 2027. Lumentum reported 90% revenue growth. The optical interconnect buildout for AI is a capital expenditure cycle backed by the largest technology companies in the world.

The pattern has historical precedent. As Marc Levinson documents in The Box, the shipping container created a modular interface that collapsed freight costs — the same structural pattern happening now in optical interconnects.

The market panicked about Huawei and ignored the structural story underneath. That is the pattern: value migrates upward as lower layers commoditise, and the market is slow to update on where the new bottleneck sits.


Originally published on Telegraph

Top comments (0)