For decades ⏳, space 🚀 and defence 🛡️ systems around the world 🌏 have relied on a heterogeneous 🧽 mix of processors 🔳 each carefully chosen for determinism ♾️, reliability 💪, security 🔒, and lifecycle guarantees 💯, not 🚫 marketing trends or 📊 raw performance charts 📈.
India’s computing journey 🏞 in this domain now enters a decisive phase with the introduction of two indigenous processor 🔳 architectures 🏗️ :
VIKRAM (32-bit) 🔳 : Engineered for mission-critical embedded control in space 🛰 and defence 🔰 systems
DHRUV64 (64-bit) 🔳 : India’s first indigenous 64-bit general-purpose processor 🔳, designed for secure 🔒, high-performance computing 🚀.
This is not 🚫 a story of 🤖 technological evolution 💡 from 32-bit to 64-bit.
It is a story of intentional ✨ architectural coexistence.
In real-world 🌎 space 🚀 and defence 🛡️ platforms, processors 🔳 are selected based on determinism ⚛, power envelopes 📿, security guarantees 🔒 , and certification effort—not bit-width alone. Control systems 🎛️, avionics ✈️, guidance loops, and mission computers 🖧 solve fundamentally different problems, and therefore demand different architectural 🏗️ answers.
This article 📜 explores how VIKRAM 🔳 and DHRUV64 🔳, aligned with RISC-V principles ⚖️, form a deliberate dual-architecture strategy— one that prioritizes trust 💯, predictability ✨, and sovereign control ⚡️ across India’s space 🚀 and defence 🛡️ computing stack.
Hello Dev Family! 👋
This is ❤️🔥 Hemant Katta ⚔️
So let’s dive deep 🧠 into the engineering 🛠️ decisions, trade-offs ™, and system-level thinking 💡 behind this approach.
✨ Introduction: A Dual-Architecture Strategy, Not a Transition
India’s space 🚀 and defence 🛡️ ecosystem has reached a critical milestone 🚩 with the introduction of two indigenous processor 🔳 architectures:
- VIKRAM 🔳 : A 32-bit processor 🔳, optimized for mission-critical space 🚀 and defence 🛡️ embedded systems.
- DHRUV64 🔳 : India’s first indigenous 64-bit general-purpose processor 🔳, targeting high-performance 🚀 and secure computing 🔒.
These processors do not represent a migration from 32-bit to 64-bit.
They are purpose-built architectures, designed to operate at different layers of the same system stack.
In space 🚀 and defence 🛡️ engineering, coexistence of architectures 🏗️ is intentional and permanent 💯.
Performance 🚀, determinism ♾️, power 🔋, security 🔒, and lifecycle 🔄 constraints dictate processor 🔳 choice — not bit-width alone.
RISC-V Alignment: Why it matters for Sovereign Computing 🔧 ⁉️
Both VIKRAM 🔳 and DHRUV64 🔳 align naturally with RISC-V design philosophy.
Why RISC-V Is Strategically Relevant ⁉️
- Open and auditable ISA
- No licensing or geopolitical lock-in
- Modular extensions (only what you need)
- Long-term architectural stability
- Strong ecosystem for embedded → HPC
For defence 🛡️ systems, ISA transparency is as important as performance.
Mapping the Architectures 🏗️
| Processor | Likely RISC-V Profile |
|---|---|
| VIKRAM (32-bit) 🔳 | RV32I + M + C (minimal, deterministic) |
| DHRUV64 (64-bit) 🔳 | RV64GC + privileged + security extensions |
This allows 💯 :
- Minimal silicon for VIKRAM 🔳
- Feature-rich but controlled expansion for DHRUV64 🔳
Example 📜: Minimal RISC-V Control Loop (VIKRAM 🔳-Class) :
// Deterministic embedded control loop 🔄 (RV32)
void control_loop(void) {
while (1) {
sensor_read();
guidance_compute();
actuator_update();
}
}
RISC-V’s simplicity supports predictable timing ⏳ analysis, critical for flight ✈️ systems.
Why Space 🚀 & Defence 🛡️ Demand Indigenous Processors 🔳
Unlike commercial computing, space 🚀 and defence 🛡️ systems operate under constraints such as:
- 15–30 year operational lifecycles 🔃
- Zero-failure tolerance ✨
- Deterministic real-time behavior
- Strict power and thermal budgets 🚫
- Supply-chain and export-control risks 🚨
Foreign processors often introduce:
- Unverifiable microcode ⚛
- Opaque security mechanisms 🛠️
- Vendor-controlled lifecycles 🔃
- Strategic dependencies 🪤
Indigenous processor architectures 🏗️ enable full 💯 control over the trust boundary, starting at silicon.
VIKRAM (32-bit) 🔳: Embedded Control for Space 🚀 & Defence 🛡️
Why 32-bit Is Still Essential ⁉️
In high-assurance systems, 32-bit architectures 🔳 remain the preferred choice for embedded control.
In mission-critical systems, priorities 🎯 are:
- Deterministic execution 🛠️
- Simpler memory models 🤖
- Lower silicon complexity 🧮
- Higher reliability 🦾 under ☢️ radiation ☣️
- Ease of formal verification ✅️
- Determinism ♾️
- Low power 🔋
- Radiation tolerance ☢
- Verifiability ✔️
32-bit 🔳 architectures reduce:
- Silicon complexity 🧩
- Memory unpredictability 🚧
- Validation effort 🎯
A smaller architectural 🏗️ surface reduces unknown failure modes, This makes them ideal for safety-certified systems.
VIKRAM 🔳 Architectural Characteristics ✨
A VIKRAM-class 🔳 processor typically emphasizes 🎯 :
- 32-bit RISC instruction set 📜
- In-order execution pipeline
- Fixed or bounded instruction latency ⏳
- Minimal cache hierarchy 🔰
- Strong interrupt determinism
- Hardware fault-detection mechanisms 🛠️
This design philosophy prioritizes 📌 predictability over throughput.
Typical Deployment 🛠️ Domains
VIKRAM 🔳 is well-suited for:
- Satellite 🛰 attitude determination & control systems (ADCS)
- Launch vehicle avionics ✈️
- Missile 🚀 guidance and navigation 🧭
- 📡 Radar and communication controllers 🛰️
In these systems, missing a real-time ⌛ deadline is a system failure 💥.
Bare-Metal Deterministic Control Example 📜
// Bare-metal control loop on a 32-bit processor
# define CONTROL_PERIOD_US 1000
void control_loop(void) {
while (1) {
read_sensors();
compute_guidance();
update_actuators();
wait_until_next_cycle(CONTROL_PERIOD_US);
}
}
This style of programming 👨💻 benefits directly from:
- Predictable instruction timing ⏳
- Small, bounded memory 💾
- Minimal OS overhead ✨
DHRUV64 (64-bit) 🔳 : India’s First Indigenous 64-bit Microprocessor
Why 64-bit Is Essential ⁉️
Modern Space 🚀 & Defence 🛡️ missions demand:
- Large memory address spaces
- High-resolution sensor data 🗃️
- Large memory footprints
- Secure multi-process systems
- Advanced cryptography 🛡️
- Cryptography 🛡️ and secure networking 🖧
- AI/ML 🤖 inferencing at the edge
- Virtualization and isolation
These requirements demand 64-bit 🔳 addressability and modern OS 🪟 support.
DHRUV64 🔳 Architectural Focus 🎯
A DHRUV64-class 🔳 processor targets:
- 64-bit RISC architecture [ i.e **RV64-class architecture** ]
- Multi-core scalability
- Memory Management Unit (MMU) with virtual memory
- Multiple Privilege levels / execution modes
- Secure boot and hardware root of trust
- Cryptographic acceleration
- Optional vector or SIMD extensions
Performance is important — but control and security remain primary.
Secure Boot and Trust Establishment 💯
// Simplified secure boot flow (conceptual)
void boot_sequence(void) {
if (!verify_root_of_trust()) halt();
if (!verify_bootloader_signature()) halt();
if (!verify_kernel_image()) halt();
jump_to_kernel();
}
Indigenous silicon ensures ✅:
- Auditable boot ROM.
- No foreign microcode.
- Verifiable cryptographic implementation.
- Full trust from reset vector to OS.
Software Ecosystem Enablement
DHRUV64 🔳 supports a full software stack 🗂️:
- Secure Linux or indigenous OS
- Hypervisors for workload isolation
- Containerized applications
- AI/ML inference frameworks
- Indigenous compilers and toolchains
This enables platform sovereignty ⚜️, not just hardware independence.
RTOS vs Linux: Correct OS Pairing 🧪
This is a critical design decision, not a preference.
VIKRAM → RTOS / Bare-Metal
Best suited for:
- Hard real-time constraints
- Fixed scheduling
- Minimal latency
- Predictable memory usage
// RTOS task example
void guidance_task(void *arg) {
while (1) {
compute_guidance();
vTaskDelayUntil(&last_wake, PERIOD_MS);
}
}
DHRUV64 → Linux / Secure OS
Required for:
- Multi-process workloads
- User-space isolation
- Networking stacks
- Filesystems
- AI/ML frameworks
Linux provides flexibility, not determinism — which is acceptable at this layer.
VIKRAM 🔳 vs DHRUV64 🔳 : Architectural 🏗️ Comparison
| Dimension | VIKRAM (32-bit) 🔳 | DHRUV64 (64-bit) 🔳 |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Role | Control & reliability | Compute & scalability |
| Execution Model | In-order | In-order / limited OoO |
| Power Profile | Ultra-low | Medium to high |
| OS Support | Bare-metal / RTOS | Linux / Secure OS |
| Memory Model | Simple, bounded | Large virtual memory |
| Security | Simplicity-driven | Hardware-enforced isolation |
| Lifecycle | 20+ years | 10–20 years |
| Deployment Layer | Edge / Control | Mission compute / Backend |
They are complementary by design.
Security 🔒 : Hardware Is the First Trust Anchor
For defence 🛡️ systems, security 🔒 cannot start at the OS.
Indigenous processors enable:
- Verifiable RTL and ISA
- Trusted execution environments
- Hardware-enforced isolation
- Indigenous cryptographic primitives
- Elimination of hidden dependencies
Security 🛡️ becomes architectural 🏗️, not reactive.
Security 🛡️ Threat Model: Defence-Grade Thinking 🧠
Threat Categories Considered
- Supply-chain compromise
- Malicious 👾 firmware injection
- Runtime privilege escalation
- Side-channel leakage
- Unauthorized software execution
Architectural 🏗️ Mitigations
| Threat 🚨 | Mitigation 🚧 |
|---|---|
| Firmware tampering | Secure boot + signed images |
| Privilege escalation | Hardware privilege levels |
| Side-channel | Simpler pipelines (VIKRAM) |
| Backdoors | Auditable RISC-V ISA |
| Lifecycle risk | Indigenous control |
Security 🛡️ is architectural 🏗️, not just cryptographic.
Self-Reliance Is an Ecosystem, Not a Single Chip 🔳
Processor 🔲 sovereignty requires:
- Indigenous toolchains (compiler, linker, debugger)
- Verification & validation flows
- Long-term documentation and support
- Skilled engineering talent
- Continuous ecosystem development
Self-reliance does not mean isolation —
it means control over critical dependencies.
A Deliberate Dual-Architecture Strategy
VIKRAM (32-bit) 🔳 and DHRUV64 (64-bit) 🔳 represent a strategic, parallel architecture 🏗️ approach for India’s space 🚀 & defence 🛡️ needs.
- VIKRAM 🔳 ensures deterministic, mission-critical control
- DHRUV64 🔳 enables high-performance 🚀, secure 🔒, sovereign computing
Together 🔗️, they form the foundation 🌱 of a self-dependent, secure 🔒, and future-ready 💯 computing stack.
In space 🚀 & defence 🛡️, the ultimate benchmark 🎯 is not performance charts 📊 —
it is trust 💯, predictability ✨, and control 💪.
#hardware #processors 🔳 #embedded #space 🚀 #defence 🛡️ #riscv #systems
Final Thoughts 💡:
VIKRAM 🔳 and DHRUV64 🔳 are not competing processors 🔳.
They are complementary pillars of India’s sovereign computing strategy ⚔️.
By aligning with RISC-V, pairing the right OS to the right processor 🔳, and designing with security-first principles 📜 **, India moves closer to **true technological 🤖 self-reliance in space 🚀 and defence 🛡️ systems.
In these domains ✨, the most important metric is not ⏳ clock speed —
it is trust 💯, predictability ✨, and control 💪.
RISCV 'processors' Embedded 'linux' RTOS 'security' Space 'defence'
💬 What’s your take 🤔 on India’s sovereign 32-bit 🔳 & 64-bit 🔳 computing strategy ⚔️?
Comment 📟 below or tag me 🚀 ❤️🔥 Hemant Katta ⚔️
Let’s debate TRUST 💯, PREDICTABILITY ✨ & CONTROL 💪!







Top comments (0)