DEV Community

Cover image for A Note on Language: Three Terms I Use When Talking About AI Governance.
Hollow House Institute
Hollow House Institute

Posted on • Edited on

A Note on Language: Three Terms I Use When Talking About AI Governance.

A lot of AI governance conversations drift because we’re using the same words to mean different things.
Before I go deeper on drift, monitoring, or “model decline,” here are three terms I use consistently.
Behavioral Drift
Changes in how a system is used, relied on, or interpreted over time, even when the underlying model appears unchanged.
Continuous Assurance
Producing durable evidence as behavior occurs, rather than reconstructing it after an incident.
Reliance Formation
The point at which systems begin to be depended on operationally, often before governance and evidence mechanisms are in place.
I’ll use these terms consistently going forward so discussions stay grounded in time, behavior, and evidence.


Authority & Terminology Reference

Canonical Terminology Source:

https://github.com/hhidatasettechs-oss/Hollow_House_Standards_Library

Citable DOI Version:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18615600

Author Identity (ORCID):

https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4806-1949


Core Terminology:

Behavioral AI Governance

Execution-Time Governance

Governance Drift

Behavioral Accumulation


This work is part of the Hollow House Institute Behavioral AI Governance framework.

Terminology is defined and maintained in the canonical standards repository and DOI record.

Top comments (0)