This week, I had the opportunity to contribute to another student’s project on GitHub. It was my first time making a meaningful code change in someone else’s repository, and the process gave me valuable insight into collaboration, version control, and technical problem-solving.
Finding the Project and Setting Up
I selected Repo-Contextor as the project I wanted to contribute to. The first step was to fork the repository and clone it to my local machine. Once I had the code locally, I explored the structure to understand how the project worked and where my feature should be implemented.
The Change I Made
I introduced a new command-line flag --recent (or -r) that filters and includes only files modified within the last 7 days. This feature helps users quickly focus on the most recent changes in their repositories instead of going through all files. I also made it possible to display the last modified time for these files, giving better context about when updates happened. This improvement makes the tool more efficient and practical, especially when working with large repositories or when reviewing only recent work.
Issue I created can be found here: :Issue#2.
My pull request can be found here: Pull Request.
The main problems I faced were making sure the flag worked correctly with other options, handling unreadable files, and keeping my fork updated with the upstream repo. From this, I learned how even small changes can affect multiple parts of a project and the importance of clear documentation. Next time, I will thoroughly read the project documentation before starting to code, to avoid mistakes and ensure my changes integrate smoothly.
Technical Challenges
One of the trickiest parts was understanding how file timestamps worked in the language (Python in this case). File systems often return timestamps in seconds since the Unix epoch, so I had to compare those values against the current time and convert them into days. I also learned that timestamps can vary depending on whether you check creation time or last modified time, which made me think carefully about which one was most relevant for this feature.
Integrating into the existing codebase was another challenge. The project already had flags like --output and --format, so I needed to make sure my new options worked consistently without breaking anything else. I read through the argument parser code and made sure to extend it instead of rewriting logic that was already working.
Handling Edge Cases
A few edge cases came up:
- Files that were unreadable or binary had to be skipped gracefully.
- Empty directories needed to return no results instead of errors.
- Very large files should not cause crashes , they are now truncated when they exceed the maximum file size.
Testing was a big help here. I verified my changes by creating files with different timestamps and sizes and confirmed that the filters behaved correctly.
Receiving a Pull Request
My repository also received a pull request from another contributor. This was my first time being on the reviewing side, and it gave me a new perspective on collaboration. The contributor’s changes worked overall, but I suggested a few improvements such as clearer variable names and better inline comments to make the code easier to follow.
The process went smoothly — the contributor responded quickly, made the updates, and pushed the changes to the same branch. Once the fixes were in place, I merged the pull request.
From this experience, I learned that code review is not just about finding mistakes but about making the codebase more consistent, maintainable, and understandable for future contributors.
Top comments (0)