Barman vs pgbackrest

Dimas Adiputro · 2024-12-19T14:02:52Z

Barman vs pgbackrest : Feature pgBackRest Barman Backup Types Full, Incremental, Differential Full, Incremental (via WAL archiving) Parallel Backups Yes No Compression Yes Yes Encryption Yes No (Requires external encryption) Point-in-Time Recovery Yes Yes Performance High performance, parallel processing Good, but not as optimized as pgBackRest Ease of Use Moderate (some complexity) Easy to set up and use Restore Process Flexible, with automatic WAL recovery Simple, but less feature-rich Cross-Platform Yes Primarily Linux-based Centralized Management No Yes Retention Policies Yes Limited (manual management) Community Support Strong community and active development Active community support When to Use pgBackRest: Large Scale Systems: If you have large databases or need to backup large volumes of data with high performance and efficiency, pgBackRest is ideal due to its parallelism and delta backups. Advanced Features: If you need features like encryption, compression, and fine-tuned backup configurations, pgBackRest excels in these areas. High Availability and Replication: If you are using streaming replication or other advanced PostgreSQL features, pgBackRest integrates well into these environments. When to Use Barman: Small to Medium Systems: Barman is well-suited for smaller to medium-sized PostgreSQL environments where simplicity and ease of use are the primary concerns. Centralized Management: If you have multiple PostgreSQL instances and need centralized backup management, Barman is a good choice. Basic Backup and Recovery Needs: If you don't require advanced features like parallel backups or encryption, Barman provides a straightforward solution for backup and recovery tasks.

Barman vs pgbackrest :

Feature	pgBackRest	Barman
Backup Types	Full, Incremental, Differential	Full, Incremental (via WAL archiving)
Parallel Backups	Yes	No
Compression	Yes	Yes
Encryption	Yes	No (Requires external encryption)
Point-in-Time Recovery	Yes	Yes
Performance	High performance, parallel processing	Good, but not as optimized as pgBackRest
Ease of Use	Moderate (some complexity)	Easy to set up and use
Restore Process	Flexible, with automatic WAL recovery	Simple, but less feature-rich
Cross-Platform	Yes	Primarily Linux-based
Centralized Management	No	Yes
Retention Policies	Yes	Limited (manual management)
Community Support	Strong community and active development	Active community support

When to Use pgBackRest:

Large Scale Systems: If you have large databases or need to backup large volumes of data with high performance and efficiency, pgBackRest is ideal due to its parallelism and delta backups.
Advanced Features: If you need features like encryption, compression, and fine-tuned backup configurations, pgBackRest excels in these areas.
High Availability and Replication: If you are using streaming replication or other advanced PostgreSQL features, pgBackRest integrates well into these environments.

When to Use Barman:

Small to Medium Systems: Barman is well-suited for smaller to medium-sized PostgreSQL environments where simplicity and ease of use are the primary concerns.
Centralized Management: If you have multiple PostgreSQL instances and need centralized backup management, Barman is a good choice.
Basic Backup and Recovery Needs: If you don't require advanced features like parallel backups or encryption, Barman provides a straightforward solution for backup and recovery tasks.

Top comments (1)

mario • Mar 5

someone can help me: with pgbackrest I did restore end of backup or end of log or latest PIT or PIT and my database are always in read mode (all db in my instance are in read mode). Do I need to switch manually to write mode?