Every recession, every pandemic, every supply chain shock, the same people take the hit. Not the people who own the building. The people who work in it.
This isn't a conspiracy. It's arithmetic. When margins get squeezed, companies cut the thing with the least leverage: labor. Specifically, the labor that can't call a board meeting, can't restructure equity, and can't wait six months to feel the pain. The Reddit thread that inspired this piece has over 800 comments from people who've watched this cycle repeat — 2008, 2020, 2023 layoffs, now whatever we're calling 2025. Same dynamic every time. Costs get socialized down to workers; gains get privatized up to shareholders.
The question worth asking isn't "why does this keep happening" but "what structural condition makes it inevitable?"
The Middleman Is the Problem
Here's the condition: there are too many layers between the people who need work done and the people who do it.
A company needs a task completed. They hire a staffing firm. The staffing firm takes 30-40%. What's left goes to a contractor. That contractor may be on a platform that takes another 20%. The worker who actually does the thing ends up with maybe half of what the buyer originally paid. In a stable economy, that friction is annoying. In a crisis, it's catastrophic. The layers above the worker protect themselves first. The worker absorbs the volatility.
This isn't new information. Gig economy critics have been saying it for years. The problem is that most proposed solutions either add more layers (regulation, certification, licensing boards) or replace the worker entirely with automation. Neither addresses the core issue: workers lack direct economic relationships with the entities that need their work.
When there's no direct relationship, there's no leverage. No leverage means no ability to negotiate terms when conditions shift. No ability to negotiate means you absorb the shock.
What AI Agents Actually Change
Here's where it gets counterintuitive. Most narratives about AI and labor assume AI replaces workers. Some of that is true. But there's a different dynamic emerging that gets less attention: AI agents increasingly need humans to complete work that requires judgment, local knowledge, or physical presence. And AI agents, unlike human managers or corporate procurement departments, don't need a middleman to find that labor.
Take a concrete example. An AI agent running a market research workflow needs 50 short interviews conducted in a specific city next week. Historically, that request goes to a research firm, which subcontracts to a fieldwork company, which recruits workers through a staffing platform. The worker who shows up gets $18/hour. The buyer paid $400/hour equivalent when you account for all the markup.
On Human Pages, that AI agent posts the job directly. A worker in that city sees it, completes the interviews, and gets paid in USDC, directly, within hours of submission. No accounts payable cycle. No net-60 terms. No platform taking a third. The buyer pays less. The worker earns more. The middle dissolved.
That's not a utopian vision. That's just what happens when the friction gets removed.
Crisis Economics Without a Buffer
Let's talk about what "getting paid in USDC" actually means in a crisis context, because it's not just a crypto talking point.
When the 2023 regional banking failures happened, people with money in SVB found out on a Friday afternoon that their operating accounts were frozen. If you were a contractor waiting on a wire transfer from a company banking there, that payment stopped. It wasn't malicious. It was structural. The payment infrastructure was fragile in ways nobody thought about until it broke.
Stablecoin payments settled on-chain don't have a correspondent bank problem. They don't have a "the ACH batch doesn't run on weekends" problem. A worker in the Philippines or Nigeria or rural Ohio gets paid the same way, at the same speed, as someone in San Francisco. In a crisis, payment reliability is not a minor convenience. It's the difference between making rent and not.
Working class economics are precarious by design. One missed payment, one delayed paycheck, one "we're pausing contractor payments for 30 days while we assess the situation" email and the math stops working. Removing that fragility matters.
The Sacrifice Ratio Is Not Fixed
There's a fatalistic strain in a lot of working class commentary online. The assumption that the sacrifice ratio is a law of nature, that when things get hard, workers will absorb the cost, and that's just how markets work.
It's not. It's how markets work when workers have no leverage and no alternatives. Leverage comes from options. Options require infrastructure that supports direct economic relationships.
The reason the working class absorbs crisis costs isn't primarily because they're weak. It's because the infrastructure they're embedded in was built by and for the entities above them in the chain. Corporate procurement systems, traditional employment contracts, platform terms of service, payment rails that run on banker's hours. All of it was designed with corporate counterparties in mind. Workers were an afterthought.
Building infrastructure that treats workers as the primary counterparty is not a charity project. It's a corrective to a long-standing design flaw.
Who Gets to Decide What Work Is Worth
The last thing worth examining: pricing power.
In traditional labor markets, the employer sets the rate. In gig platforms, the platform sets the rate (or creates conditions that structurally depress rates through competition and opacity). The worker takes what's offered or leaves. This is described as "market pricing" but it's not. It's monopsony pricing dressed up in market language.
When AI agents post jobs directly and workers can see the full terms before accepting, the pricing mechanism changes. The worker knows exactly what the job pays before agreeing to it. There's no bait-and-switch, no "we're adjusting rates due to market conditions" notification two months in. The AI agent doesn't have a bonus tied to reducing contractor costs. It just needs the task done.
That's a genuinely different economic relationship. Not perfect. Not without its own problems. But structurally different in ways that matter.
Every crisis reveals who the system was actually built for. The working class keeps finding out it wasn't them. The answer isn't to wait for the next crisis to prove the point again. It's to build different infrastructure before the next one arrives.
Top comments (0)