Coverage originated as an internal industry document. Studios and agencies receive more
scripts than any executive can read, so readers produce a standard summary and recommendation.
It was never designed to help writers improve, which explains a lot about how it feels to
receive.
What is in a coverage report
Logline. One sentence summary.
Synopsis. Usually one to two pages of plot.
Comments. The analytical section, typically one to three pages.
Grid. Ratings across premise, structure, character, dialogue.
Recommendation. Pass, consider, or recommend. In practice almost everything
is a pass.
What it is genuinely good for
An outside read from someone with no relationship to you. Nobody protecting
your feelings.
Calibration. A rough sense of how your script lands with someone who reads
many of them.
Catching obvious problems. A confusing first act or an unclear protagonist
gets flagged reliably.
What it is not good for
Development. Coverage tells you a verdict. Development requires a
conversation, and you cannot ask a report a follow up question or explain why you made a choice.
Consistency. Reader quality varies enormously and you usually do not know who
read it, how long they spent, or how many scripts they read that day.
Distinguishing a symptom from a cause. A reader reports losing interest in act
two. The cause is often in act one. Coverage typically reports where the experience failed, not
where it broke.
Anything about your specific ambitions. Coverage measures a script against
general expectations of a commercial screenplay. If you are deliberately working against
convention, that reads as a flaw.
When coverage is the right purchase
Buy it when you have a finished draft, you have already had it read by people you trust, and
you want an outside professional temperature check before submitting somewhere.
Do not buy it when you are stuck, when the script is unfinished, or when what you actually need
is someone to think with. Coverage is an assessment tool. Using it as a development tool is the
most common way writers waste money on it.
How to read coverage without being destroyed by it
Wait a day. The first reading is emotional and useless analytically.
Separate observations from prescriptions. Where the reader lost interest is
data. What they suggest you do about it is one person's opinion.Look for what they got wrong. If a reader misunderstood the plot, that is
your problem, not theirs. Misreadings are the most valuable part of the report.Ignore the grid. Ratings compress a complex response into a number that
tells you nothing actionable.
The mismatch
Most writers buying coverage want to know whether their script is good and what to do next.
Coverage answers a different question, which is whether this script is worth an executive's time.
Those are related but not the same, and the gap between them is why so many writers find coverage
both expensive and unsatisfying.
Originally published at https://www.moviementors.ai/answers/script-coverage-explained.html.
Written by the team behind Movie Mentors.
Top comments (0)