DEV Community

Cover image for Azure’s New GCP Connector: Single Pane of Glass for Multi-Cloud Management (AWS, Azure, GCP in 2026)
inboryn
inboryn

Posted on

Azure’s New GCP Connector: Single Pane of Glass for Multi-Cloud Management (AWS, Azure, GCP in 2026)

Multi-cloud is no longer a buzzword—it’s reality. Organizations now average 2.6 cloud providers, driven by digital sovereignty requirements, resilience needs, and avoiding vendor lock-in.

The problem? Managing resources across AWS, Azure, and GCP has been a nightmare of context-switching, separate consoles, and fragmented visibility.

Microsoft’s December 2025 announcement changes this: a new GCP connector (Preview) that projects Google Cloud resources directly into Azure’s management plane, joining the existing AWS connector to create a true single pane of glass for multi-cloud operations.

This isn’t just another integration—it’s a strategic shift in how enterprises can approach multi-cloud without drowning in operational complexity.

What the Azure GCP Connector Actually Does

The GCP connector extends Azure Arc’s capabilities to project Google Cloud resources into Azure Resource Manager (ARM). Here’s what that means in practice:

Unified inventory: View and manage GCP Compute Engine VMs, Cloud SQL databases, GKE clusters, and Cloud Storage buckets alongside Azure and AWS resources—all from the Azure portal.

Centralized policy enforcement: Apply Azure Policy across GCP resources. Enforce tagging standards, security baselines, and compliance requirements without learning GCP’s native policy frameworks.

Single RBAC model: Use Azure Active Directory (Entra ID) for access control across all three clouds. No more juggling AWS IAM, Azure RBAC, and GCP IAM separately.

Integrated monitoring: Azure Monitor and Log Analytics can now ingest telemetry from GCP resources, giving you cross-cloud observability without third-party tools.

This builds on the AWS connector (already generally available), which does the same for EC2 instances, RDS databases, EKS clusters, and S3 buckets.

Why This Matters for Multi-Cloud Strategy

The traditional multi-cloud approach required separate teams, tools, and expertise for each provider:

AWS team uses CloudWatch, IAM, and Organizations
Azure team uses Monitor, Entra ID, and Management Groups
GCP team uses Cloud Monitoring, Cloud IAM, and Resource Manager

This fragmentation created operational silos, inconsistent security postures, and audit nightmares.

Azure’s unified approach changes the equation:

Single management console: Reduce context-switching and tool sprawl
Consistent governance: Apply the same policies across all clouds
Simplified compliance: One audit trail, one RBAC model, one monitoring stack
Reduced training overhead: Teams learn Azure tools once, apply everywhere

For enterprises running hybrid/multi-cloud Kubernetes (AKS + EKS + GKE), this is particularly powerful—AKS Fleet Manager can now centralize policy sync and deployments across all three providers.

How It Compares to Native Multi-Cloud Tools

Azure’s approach differs fundamentally from third-party multi-cloud management platforms:

Native integration: Built on Azure Arc, not a bolt-on layer
No data egress: Resources stay in their native clouds; only metadata is projected
Provider-agnostic policies: Write once in Azure Policy, enforce everywhere
Zero additional licensing: Included with Azure Arc (no per-resource fees)

Compare this to alternatives:

HashiCorp Terraform: IaC provisioning, but no runtime management or monitoring
CloudHealth/CloudBolt: Third-party platforms with separate licensing and data replication
AWS Control Tower: AWS-only; doesn’t help with Azure or GCP

Azure’s bet: Customers prefer a first-party solution that leverages existing Azure investments rather than adopting yet another platform.

The Bottom Line

Azure’s GCP connector isn’t just about consolidating dashboards—it’s a strategic play to make Azure the control plane for multi-cloud operations.

For enterprises already committed to multi-cloud (2.6 providers average), this solves operational complexity without forcing a full Azure migration. You can keep workloads where they are while centralizing governance, security, and observability.

The preview status means early adopters should expect limitations, but the direction is clear: 2026 will see multi-cloud management shift from fragmented tools to unified control planes—and Microsoft just made a major move.

Top comments (0)