DEV Community

Cover image for SQL index types B TREE, HASH, GIST, GIST, BRIN, and GIN
fajar sp
fajar sp

Posted on

SQL index types B TREE, HASH, GIST, GIST, BRIN, and GIN

This Original Post is here

Differences Between Index Types: BTREE, HASH, GIST, SPGIST, BRIN, and GIN

Indexes in databases are used to speed up data search and retrieval. PostgreSQL supports various index types designed for specific query types and data structures. Below are the main differences between these index types:

GIST, SPGIST, BRIN, and GIN index features are exclusive to PostgreSQL.


1. BTREE (Balanced Tree)

  • Characteristics: Balanced tree structure.
  • Best suited for:
    • Search operations involving comparisons (=, <, <=, >, >=).
    • Sortable data (e.g., numbers, text, dates).
  • Advantages:
    • Default index type in PostgreSQL.
    • Performs well for most common queries.
  • Disadvantages:
    • Inefficient for very large datasets without proper filtering criteria.
    • Suboptimal for proximity searches or multidimensional data.

2. HASH

  • Characteristics: Uses a hash function to generate the index.
  • Best suited for:
    • Exact match searches (=).
  • Advantages:
    • High performance for exact value searches.
  • Disadvantages:
    • Does not support comparison operations (<, >).
    • Limited functionality compared to BTREE.

3. GIST (Generalized Search Tree)

  • Characteristics: Flexible index type for complex data.
  • Best suited for:
    • Multidimensional data such as geospatial, networking, or full-text search.
    • Queries requiring special operators (e.g., geographic distance, overlap).
  • Advantages:
    • Supports various data types and operations.
    • Suitable for data requiring non-linear comparison functions.
  • Disadvantages:
    • Slower than BTREE for simple queries.

4. SPGIST (Space-Partitioned GIST)

  • Characteristics: Specialized version of GIST, designed for hierarchical or spatially partitioned data.
  • Best suited for:
    • Geospatial data or data with hierarchy.
    • Searching specific points in large spaces (e.g., nearest-neighbor searches).
  • Advantages:
    • More efficient than GIST for sparse or scattered data.
  • Disadvantages:
    • More complex implementation.

5. BRIN (Block Range Indexes)

  • Characteristics: Block-based index that stores metadata about data ranges in blocks.
  • Best suited for:
    • Very large datasets with sequential or patterned data.
    • Queries filtering data by value ranges.
  • Advantages:
    • Very small index size.
    • Extremely fast for large datasets with matching patterns.
  • Disadvantages:
    • Inefficient for random or patternless datasets.
    • Not ideal for precise searches.

6. GIN (Generalized Inverted Index)

  • Characteristics: Inverted index storing lists of elements present in a column (similar to a book index).
  • Best suited for:
    • Full-text search or array operations.
    • Queries on JSON data or columns with array types.
  • Advantages:
    • Extremely fast for operations involving multiple elements (e.g., word search in text).
    • Optimized for complex data structures like JSON or arrays.
  • Disadvantages:
    • Slower index creation compared to BTREE.
    • Higher memory consumption.

Comparison Table Summary

Index Type Best Suited For Key Operators Index Size Speed
BTREE General searches =, <, > Medium Fast
HASH Exact value searches = Small Very fast
GIST Multidimensional, geospatial data Custom Large Flexible
SPGIST Hierarchical, sparse geospatial Custom Medium Efficient
BRIN Large sequential datasets Range Very small Fast (with pattern)
GIN Full-text, JSON, array search @>, <@, && Large Very fast

Conclusion

  • BTREE: Default, suitable for most use cases.
  • HASH: For fast single-value searches.
  • GIST/SPGIST: For complex data like geospatial or hierarchical structures.
  • BRIN: For large datasets with sequential patterns.
  • GIN: For full-text, JSON, or array searches.

The choice of index depends on the type of data and the queries frequently executed in your application.

Canonical URL
For more detailed information, visit the original post on my blog.

Top comments (0)