For about four months I ran what I thought was a content distribution system. I wrote one post, pasted it into five platforms, and four of them did nothing. I blamed the algorithms.
The algorithms were not it. One piece of writing was trying to serve five reading situations.
Someone reading a forum thread is scanning to work out whether the problem you are describing is one they have. Someone scrolling a feed is scanning for a reason to stop moving. Someone opening a long form post has already decided to give you a minute. That is three different jobs for the first sentence, even when the idea underneath is identical.
Two habits fixed most of it.
Cut down, do not pad up
I write the idea once at its longest honest length, the version where I have said everything I actually have. Every platform then gets a cut of that. The short ones get the sharpest 40 words rather than a paragraph that gets amputated at the character limit.
Padding a thin idea out to fill a long post is how you end up with filler paragraphs that say nothing. Cutting a full idea down to fit a short one just makes it denser.
Rewrite the opening, leave the middle alone
The opening is the part most people read anywhere, so it is the part that has to be native to where it lands. The middle travels fine.
On a forum the opening states the problem, because people are scanning to see whether it is their problem. On a feed it has to be a claim someone would push back on, because people are scanning for a reason to stop.
A quick diagnostic
If you are not sure which one you are doing, try pasting your post into a different platform without changing anything. If it fits perfectly, that is usually a sign it was written for no one in particular rather than a sign it was written well for both.
Top comments (0)