enterprise-grade DevOps strategy, not tools.
our focus is:
- Shared pipelines
- Version control strategy
- Safe rollouts
- Image security governance
- Multi-service blue-green
- Centralized base images
- Distributed tracing
- Rollback strategy
- Enterprise routing design
- Upgrade enforcement
So this is a FULL ENTERPRISE DEVOPS LAB
This lab simulates a real enterprise with:
- 10 microservices
- Shared CI/CD templates
- Centralized base image repo
- Blue-Green deployment
- Image vulnerability enforcement
- Versioned Terraform modules
- ArgoCD GitOps
- Distributed tracing
- Rollback strategy
🏗️ Architecture Overview
Client
→ Load Balancer
→ Ingress
→ 10 Microservices
→ Shared Base Image
→ Centralized CI Templates
→ ArgoCD
→ EKS Cluster
Monitoring:
- Prometheus
- Grafana
- Jaeger (Tracing)
- ELK (Logging)
PART 1 — CENTRALIZED BASE IMAGE STRATEGY
Step 1: Create Base Image Repository
Repo: enterprise-base-images
Dockerfile:
FROM amazonlinux:2023
RUN yum update -y && \
yum install -y python3
LABEL maintainer="platform-team"
Push to ECR:
docker build -t enterprise/python-base:1.0 .
docker push <ecr>/enterprise/python-base:1.0
Step 2: Application Repo Uses Approved Base
Each microservice repo:
FROM <ecr>/enterprise/python-base:1.0
COPY app.py /app/
CMD ["python3", "/app/app.py"]
Now base image is centralized and controlled.
PART 2 — SHARED CI/CD TEMPLATE
Create repo: ci-templates
ci-template.yml
stages:
- build
- scan
- deploy
build:
script:
- docker build -t $IMAGE_TAG .
- docker push $IMAGE_TAG
scan:
script:
- trivy image $IMAGE_TAG
deploy:
script:
- git commit -am "update image"
Each microservice repo references it.
Now shared logic = centralized.
PART 3 — VERSIONED MODULE STRATEGY
Terraform modules repo:
modules/
vpc/
eks/
rds/
Applications reference:
module "eks" {
source = "git::https://repo//modules/eks?ref=v1.2.0"
}
Upgrade safely by bumping version.
PART 4 — BLUE GREEN DEPLOYMENT PER MICROSERVICE
For each service:
Blue Deployment:
metadata:
labels:
app: users
version: blue
Green Deployment:
metadata:
labels:
app: users
version: green
Service:
selector:
app: users
version: blue
Switch:
selector:
app: users
version: green
PART 5 — 100 SERVICES SCENARIO
Only 10 services modified.
Only those 10 get green deployments.
Routing remains unchanged for other 90.
PART 6 — IMAGE GOVERNANCE SCENARIO
Interview question:
“How do you know which services use bad base image?”
Answer implementation:
grep -r "python-base:1.0" .
Cluster check:
kubectl get pods -A -o jsonpath="{..image}"
Enforce via policy:
Use OPA / Kyverno:
deny:
message: "Unapproved base image"
PART 7 — DISTRIBUTED TRACING
Install Jaeger.
Each service:
trace_id = request.headers.get("X-Trace-ID")
Logs include trace ID.
Search in ELK:
trace_id: 12345
Jaeger UI shows full request graph.
PART 8 — PATCHING + ROLLBACK LAB
Before Linux upgrade:
aws ec2 create-snapshot
If failure:
aws ec2 create-volume --snapshot-id snap-xxxx
Or:
yum downgrade package-name
PART 9 — SAFE SHARED TEMPLATE UPDATE
- Create new template version v2
- Test against sample apps (3 representative apps)
- Validate in staging
- Gradual rollout
- Monitor
- Rollback if needed
PART 10 — FORCED SECURITY UPGRADE SCENARIO
If base image vulnerable:
- Build new base image 1.1
- Update CI policy to block old tag
- Auto-create PRs to update Dockerfiles
- Argo deploy
- Monitor
PART 11 — ENTERPRISE ROUTING
Single Ingress:
rules:
- path: /users
backend: users-service
- path: /orders
backend: orders-service
Blue-green switching happens at Service level, not Ingress.
WHY INTERVIEWER can ask
- Do you understand governance?
- Do you understand scale?
- Do you understand versioning?
- Do you understand impact isolation?
- Do you understand rollout safety?
- Do you understand enterprise control model?
Not just Kubernetes commands.
You now answer with:
- Versioning strategy
- Centralized control
- Gradual rollout
- Governance enforcement
- Observability validation
- Rollback plan
Top comments (0)