DEV Community

Khant Htet Naing(Kent)
Khant Htet Naing(Kent)

Posted on

How not to mess up Sessions in your sensitive web apps

The thing about Session is you read some articles about how it works. You think you understand it well but you are still struggled to apply that effectively.

I have also struggled to manage and apply Sessions in my Session sensitive web apps.
Then I just made an abstract pattern to memorize how the session works for myself.

[“SessionName”, “BrowserId”] = Value(The value that we want to store in Session)

Let’s say our program is already deployed in web server and there is one user who logins and it’s Id would be stored in Session[“UserId”].

For that user, the program will check there is already session name with “UserId” and if it is, it will keep on checking it’s “Browser Id”, if both “Session Name” which is “UseId” and “BrowserId” are already there, it will override the existing value otherwise it will create a new value.

[“UserId”, “b1”] = 1

Even though all the users access the Session Name “UserId” parallel , that doesn’t make the values overwrote because they access from different browsers.

So the values would be like

[“UserId”, “b1”] = 1
[“UserId”, “b2”] = 2
[“UserId”, “b3”] = 3

If one different user try to access the same program with the same browser (let’s say “b3” and it’s UseId is 5).

[“UserId”, “b3”] = 3 (Already existed one)
[“UserId”, “b3”] = 5 (The value 3 would be overwritten because both “UserId” and “browserId” are the same.)

The most distinct example in real life is FaceBook. We try to login Facebook with one user(Eg. Ken) then open another tab and try to login with different user(Eg.John). When you try to refresh the page of “Ken” , it will be updated to “John” page. Because it is overwritten by userId of “John” and they just used the same browser.

[“UserId”, “b1” ] = 1 (Id of “Ken”) is overwritten by
[“UserId”, “b1” ] = 2 (Id of “John”)

I just want to point out again that this is just an abstract pattern that I came up with just try to avoid mistakes and not to mess up if your app use so many sessions and depends on it a lot. This does not necessarily mean Session works exactly that way.

Even though it is OK that we could make an abstract pattern and use that to memorize, it is still very important to know how it really works behind and I suggest you guys keep reading about that.

Thanks and any suggestion is welcomed.

Edited : Thomas Junk explained really well how it really works behind in the comment.

Top comments (4)

thomasjunkos profile image
Thomas Junkツ • Edited

Traditional sessions are simple.

You need

  • An identifier for an active session which someone posesses (say in form of a cookie)

  • A storage for current running sessions (= session data) which allows someone with a valid identifier to use just this session

Session storages work with the lookup principle (key/value): They return for any identifier what was stored (say: user's ID, first name, last name, $whatever).

If someone gives you correct credentials you give them in turn a session identifier. Everybody with this identifier has access to the ressources protected by this until the session expires or the identifier is lost.

You could cryptographically sign the session identifier if you want to feel super safe - but the benefit from that is doubted. But typically a sufficiently long enough identifier is enough.

From that said, it is clear, that for any adversary it is in his main interest to get hold of said identifier (next to credentials) in order to compromise a user.

There are additional ways of securing this:

  • using HTTPS for securing the transport
  • making sure you only hand a cookie over a HTTPS connection
  • using httponly cookies to make sure JS has no access to it
kent profile image
Khant Htet Naing(Kent)

Thank you for commenting, Thomas. You explained it very well. I really appreciate that.

kashsbd profile image
Prakash Subedi

Awesome Kent !!

kent profile image
Khant Htet Naing(Kent)

Thanks, dude 🥰