Honestly it might be better to go for Arch + some standard desktop environment.
I used both Manjaro and Arch for a while, the worst part for a newcomer is trying to make big system updates:
You can quickly run into dependency hell with half of your programs still using some old version of some common library, while the other half updated to a new one. Sometimes pacman detects that and just doesn't let you update...
I only saw it with Manjaro; a major system update may update kernel headers or something, but not update your kernel (cuz manjaro has a somewhat custom kernel) which when leads to you being stuck in the bootloader cuz it can't find your kernel.
I crush my system when trying to update things almost every time π€¦
Another thing which is only there for Arch - trying to connect to wifi; and other network related issues, those are fun to solve for sure :) Manjaro does better in that regard.
I used Manjaro for awhile and itβs really good, I jump around a lot too between distros I know itβs pointless because they are all virtually the same.
my mentor would push people to abandon windows and mac despite their tech level. and for those who only use a mouse and office, hed always suggest Manjaro
An ever-smiling full-stack developer, specializing in the rapid development of custom web applications. Always eager to learn new technologies and concepts and share knowledge.
French web developer mainly but touches everything. Volunteer admin mod here at DEV. I learn AI and Astro at this moment and databases. β Addict to Cappuccino and Music
I can relate <3
It is so easy in Linux to mess up ur whole operating system by wrongly using the command line to manage the packages.
I loved my time with Manjaro and I will definitely be back for it
I donβt use it because I like to use the same environment as my servers. I donβt want to use pacman for my desktop and apt for my servers. Iβd rather use apt for both.
Honestly it might be better to go for Arch + some standard desktop environment.
I used both Manjaro and Arch for a while, the worst part for a newcomer is trying to make big system updates:
I crush my system when trying to update things almost every time π€¦
Another thing which is only there for Arch - trying to connect to wifi; and other network related issues, those are fun to solve for sure :) Manjaro does better in that regard.
I used Manjaro for awhile and itβs really good, I jump around a lot too between distros I know itβs pointless because they are all virtually the same.
my mentor would push people to abandon windows and mac despite their tech level. and for those who only use a mouse and office, hed always suggest Manjaro
ππ Yeah..
The best thing about manjaro is it's actually lightweight
I love this OS β€οΈ
I can relate <3
It is so easy in Linux to mess up ur whole operating system by wrongly using the command line to manage the packages.
I loved my time with Manjaro and I will definitely be back for it
I donβt use it because I like to use the same environment as my servers. I donβt want to use pacman for my desktop and apt for my servers. Iβd rather use apt for both.
Manjaro is great! I have it as a dual boot with arch π
Manjaro is the bomb.
Manjaro cured me of the pain of using Linux. It's simply a bomb. A weight was lifted off my shoulders when I got to know this operating system.