DEV Community

Cover image for Open Source AI Showdown 2026: Llama 4 vs Gemma 4 vs DeepSeek V4 vs GLM-5.1
LazyDev_OH
LazyDev_OH

Posted on • Originally published at gocodelab.com

Open Source AI Showdown 2026: Llama 4 vs Gemma 4 vs DeepSeek V4 vs GLM-5.1

Open source AI models are beating paid models now. GLM-5.1 scored #1 on SWE-Bench Pro, ahead of Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.4. And it's free under MIT license.

As of April 2026, four open-source LLMs stand out. Here's how they compare.

Quick Comparison

Llama 4 Maverick Gemma 4 DeepSeek V4 GLM-5.1
Developer Meta Google DeepSeek Z.ai (Zhipu)
Parameters 400B (17B active) 26B (3.8B active) ~1T (37B active) 744B (40B active)
Context 1M tokens 256K 1M tokens
License Llama License Apache 2.0 MIT MIT
Local Run Difficult 18GB RAM Difficult Difficult
API Price $0.19/M Free (local) $0.30/M Subscription

All four use MoE (Mixture of Experts) architecture — like a buffet that prepares every dish but serves each guest only what they need.

Llama 4 Maverick — The 1M Token Giant

400B total parameters with 128 experts, but only 17B active per inference. The biggest weapon is the 1 million token context window — the widest among open-source models.

MMLU 85.5%, highest among open models. But the Llama License isn't fully open source — if your service has 700M+ MAU, you need separate permission from Meta.

Gemma 4 — Frontier AI on Your Laptop

Google's 26B MoE model runs locally with just 18GB RAM. Install via Ollama in 5 minutes. Your data never leaves your machine.

Apache 2.0 — the most permissive license. No MAU caps, no restrictions, full commercial freedom. 140+ languages supported. MMLU Pro 85.2%, Arena AI #3 among open models.

DeepSeek V4 — 1/50th the Price

~1 trillion parameters, SWE-bench Verified 81%. API pricing: $0.30 input, $0.50 output per million tokens. That's roughly 1/50th of GPT-5.4's cost at ~90% quality.

1M token context with 97% Needle-in-a-Haystack accuracy. MIT license. If cost matters, this is the answer.

GLM-5.1 — Coding Benchmark Champion

Z.ai (formerly Zhipu AI) released this on April 7, 2026. SWE-Bench Pro: 58.4 — #1, beating Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.4. First open-source model to top this benchmark.

The standout feature: 8-hour autonomous coding. It can work on a single coding task for up to 8 hours without human intervention. MIT license, weights on Hugging Face.

When to Use What

Situation Pick Why
Coding automation GLM-5.1 SWE-Bench Pro #1, 8h autonomous
API service at scale DeepSeek V4 1/50th GPT price, 90% quality
Local / offline AI Gemma 4 18GB RAM, Ollama, 5 min setup
Large document processing Llama 4 1M tokens, MMLU 85.5%
License freedom Gemma 4 / DeepSeek Apache 2.0 / MIT

No single winner. The right choice depends on your use case. All four are free or cheap enough to try — no reason to pick just one.


Originally published at GoCodeLab. Benchmarks as of April 2026.

Top comments (0)