DEV Community

Xiaoyun Zhang
Xiaoyun Zhang

Posted on

Understanding Event-Based and Process-Based Workflows

When managing tasks and automating processes, whether in software development or business operations, two primary workflow types come into play: event-based and process-based workflows. Recognizing their differences helps in choosing the right approach for your needs.

Event-Based Workflows

Definition:

Event-based workflows are driven by external events or triggers, causing specific actions to occur often asynchronously. These workflows are ideal for systems requiring adaptability and quick response to real-time stimuli.

Simple Example:

Consider a web page where a user clicks the "Submit" button. This action initiates several asynchronous tasks:

  1. Validating the form data.
  2. Sending the data to a server.
  3. Displaying a confirmation message to the user.

Real-World Applications:

  • Social Media Reactions: Liking or commenting on a post triggers notifications and updates for users in real-time.
  • Online Notification Systems: Such as whenever a new email is received or a milestone is achieved on a software platform.

Analogy with Reactive Programming:

Think of a restaurant where orders come in randomly. Chefs (reactive system) start preparing each order as it arrives, adapting to the inbound requests without a fixed order, akin to event-based workflows reacting to triggers.

Process-Based Workflows

Definition:

These workflows follow a strict, predefined sequence where each task is executed in order. This structured approach is beneficial for repeatable operations requiring consistency and control.

Simple Example:

In a document approval process, a document undergoes a clear sequence:

  1. Submission by the originator.
  2. Initial review by a manager.
  3. Subsequent approval by a department head.
  4. Final approval by an executive.

Real-World Applications:

  • Loan Processing Systems: Loans pass through set stages of assessment and approval.
  • Manufacturing Assembly Lines: Products are assembled through a fixed sequence to ensure quality.

Analogy with Imperative Programming:

Similar to following a recipe for baking a cake, each step (mix ingredients, bake, cool) must be performed in order for successful completion.

Comparison Chart

Feature Event-Based Workflow Process-Based Workflow
Nature Asynchronous, flexible Sequential, structured
Trigger Events Predefined process steps
Flow Non-linear Linear
Programming Style Reactive Programming Imperative Programming
Use Cases Real-time notifications, dynamic interactions Structured approvals, manufacturing processes

Visual Aids

Event-Based Workflow Diagram:

[User Clicks Button]
        |
    [Trigger Event]
    /      |       \
[Action 1][Action 2][Action 3]
(independent actions)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Process-Based Workflow Diagram:

[Start] -> [Step 1] -> [Step 2] -> [Step 3] -> [End]
(Sequential steps)
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Conclusion:

Event-based workflows excel in environments that demand flexibility and quick adaptation to external triggers, such as real-time data operations, while process-based workflows are well-suited for tasks that require control and adherence to a linear progression, such as compliance and manufacturing processes. Understanding these distinctions helps in designing systems that optimize efficiency and response according to the specific context and requirements.

Top comments (0)

Billboard image

The Next Generation Developer Platform

Coherence is the first Platform-as-a-Service you can control. Unlike "black-box" platforms that are opinionated about the infra you can deploy, Coherence is powered by CNC, the open-source IaC framework, which offers limitless customization.

Learn more